...
首页> 外文期刊>The Neurohospitalist >ABCD2 Score and Large-Artery Atherosclerosis
【24h】

ABCD2 Score and Large-Artery Atherosclerosis

机译:ABCD2评分与大动脉粥样硬化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and Purpose: Extracranial stenosis (ECS) or intracranial stenosis (ICS) are independent risk factors for stroke after transient ischemic attack (TIA). We examined the association of the age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms and diabetes (ABCD2) score, a validated risk prediction model for stroke after TIA, and the presence of ICS or ECS. Methods: Vascular imaging and ABCD2 scores were obtained in a retrospective cohort of 77 consecutive patients diagnosed with TIA in a single center emergency department. The association between vascular stenosis and ABCD2 scores and how each related to clinical outcome was examined. Results: In all, 30 (39.2%) TIA patients had 37 stenotic lesions; 15 (40.5%) stenotic lesions were ICS and 22 (59.5%) stenotic lesions were ECS. A total of 7 patients (9.5%) had both ECS and ICS lesions. Patients with ABCD2 > 3 were more likely to have ICS (odds ratio [OR] = 6.25, confidence interval [Cl] 1.39-32.44, P = .009) and ECS (OR = 5.25, Cl = 1.56-17.66, P = .005). Of the 37 stenotic lesions, 21 (56.7%) were symptomatic; 4 (19.2%) of these had an ABCD2 < 3. At 7 days, there were 4 ischemic strokes, 3 had previously demonstrated symptomatic stenotic lesions, and all had ABCD2 scores > 3. Conclusions: Compared to patients in the low-risk ABCD2 scores, the patients with medium- to high-risk ABCD2 scores are more likely to have symptomatic and asymptomatic vascular stenotic lesions. However, I in 5 patients with low-risk ABCD2 score has symptomatic stenotic lesions, indicating ABCD2 score does not identify all patients with symptomatic stenotic lesions.
机译:背景与目的:颅外狭窄(ECS)或颅内狭窄(ICS)是短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后中风的独立危险因素。我们检查了年龄,血压,临床特征,症状和糖尿病持续时间(ABCD2)得分,TIA后中风的经过验证的风险预测模型以及ICS或ECS的关联。方法:在回顾性队列中,在单个中心急诊科的77例连续诊断为TIA的患者中获得了血管成像和ABCD2评分。血管狭窄与ABCD2评分之间的关​​联以及与临床结局之间的关系都得到了检查。结果:总共30例(39.2%)TIA患者患有37例狭窄病变。 ICS有15个(40.5%)狭窄病变,ECS有22个(59.5%)狭窄病变。共有7例患者(9.5%)同时患有ECS和ICS病变。 ABCD2> 3的患者更有可能患有ICS(优势比[OR] = 6.25,置信区间[Cl] 1.39-32.44,P = .009)和ECS(OR = 5.25,Cl = 1.56-17.66,P =。 005)。在37例狭窄病变中,有21例(56.7%)是有症状的。其中有4(19.2%)的ABCD2 <3。在7天时,有4次缺血性中风,3例先前显示有症状的狭窄病变,且所有ABCD2评分均>3。结论:与低危ABCD2患者相比得分为ABCD2得分为中到高的患者更有可能出现有症状和无症状的血管狭窄病变。但是,我在5例低危ABCD2评分患者中有症状性狭窄病变,表明ABCD2评分不能识别所有症状性狭窄病变患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号