首页> 外文期刊>The Netherlands journal of medicine. >New oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in countries with good INR control
【24h】

New oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in countries with good INR control

机译:在INR控制良好的国家,新型口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Routine monitoring of the international normalised ratio (INR) in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is mandatory because of a narrow therapeutic index combined with an unpredictable and highly variable anticoagulant effect. The lowest risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications is reached by maximising the time in the therapeutic range (TTR). A low TTR indicates poor INR control and has been associated with increased risks of thrombotic and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).1'2 The TTR is determined by individual characteristics, such as use of co-medication, as well as by the centre that manages the patient.1 The mean TTR per centre (cTTR) thereby reflects the quality of management of VKA therapy of that specific centre.
机译:由于治疗指数狭窄以及不可预测且高度可变的抗凝作用,因此必须定期监测接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗的患者的国际标准化比率(INR)。通过在治疗范围内(TTR)延长时间,可以将发生血栓和出血并发症的风险降至最低。低的TTR表示INR控制不良,并伴有房颤(AF)患者的血栓形成和出血并发症风险增加。1'2TTR由个体特征(例如使用联合用药以及1每个中心的平均TTR(cTTR)反映了该特定中心VKA治疗的管理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号