首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators (see c
【24h】

Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators (see c

机译:与保守治疗策略相比,急性非Q波心肌梗死患者的结果随机分配为侵入性。医院中的退伍军人事务非Q波动梗死策略(VANQWISH)试验研究者(请参阅c

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction is usually managed according to an "invasive" strategy (i.e., one of routine coronary angiography followed by myocardial revascularization). METHODS: We randomly assigned 920 patients to either "invasive" management (462 patients) or "conservative" management, defined as medical therapy and noninvasive testing, with subsequent invasive management if indicated by the development of spontaneous or inducible ischemia (458 patients), within 72 hours of the onset of a non-Q-wave infarction. Death or nonfatal infarction made up the combined primary end point. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 23 months, 152 events (80 deaths and 72 nonfatal infarctions) occurred in 138 patients who had been randomly assigned to the invasive strategy, and 139 events (59 deaths and 80 nonfatal infarctions) in 123 patients assigned to the conservative strategy (P=0.35). Patients assigned to the invasive strategy had worse clinical outcomes during the first year of follow-up. The number of patients with one of the components of the primary end point (death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and the number who died were significantly higher in the invasive-strategy group at hospital discharge (36 vs. 15 patients, P=0.004, for the primary end point; 21 vs. 6, P=0.007, for death), at one month (48 vs. 26, P=0.012; 23 vs. 9, P=0.021), and at one year (111 vs. 85, P=0.05; 58 vs. 36, P= 0.025). Overall mortality during follow-up did not differ significantly between patients assigned to the conservative-strategy group and those assigned to the invasive-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.51 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction do not benefit from routine, early invasive management consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization. A conservative, ischemia-guided initial approach is both safe and effective.
机译:背景:非Q波心肌梗塞通常是根据“侵入性”策略(即,常规冠状动脉造影后进行心肌血运重建)之一进行管理的。方法:我们将920例患者随机分为“侵入性”治疗(462例)或“保守性”治疗,定义为药物治疗和非侵入性检测,如果自发性或诱发性缺血发生,则随后进行侵入性治疗(458例),在非Q波梗死发作后的72小时内。死亡或非致命性梗死构成了合并的主要终点。结果:在平均23个月的随访期间,随机分配了侵入性策略的138例患者发生152例事件(80例死亡和72例非致命性梗死),123例患者发生139例事件(59例死亡和80例非致命性梗死)。分配给保守策略(P = 0.35)。在随访的第一年中,分配给侵入性策略的患者的临床结局较差。侵入策略组出院时具有主要终点因素之一(死亡或非致命性心肌梗塞)的患者人数和死亡人数显着更高(36例vs 15例,P = 0.004)。主要终点;死亡时21 vs. 6,P = 0.007,在一个月时(48 vs. 26,P = 0.012; 23 vs. 9,P = 0.021)和一年(111 vs. 85) ,P = 0.05; 58 vs. 36,P = 0.025)。随访至保守策略组的患者与侵入性策略组的患者在随访期间的总死亡率无显着差异(危险比0.72; 95%置信区间0.51至1.01)。结论:大多数非Q波心肌梗死患者不能从包括冠状动脉造影和血运重建在内的常规早期侵入性治疗中受益。保守的,以缺血为指导的初始方法既安全又有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号