...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease.
【24h】

Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease.

机译:Idraparinux与标准疗法治疗静脉血栓栓塞性疾病。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by a vitamin K antagonist. We investigated the potential use of idraparinux, a long-acting inhibitor of activated factor X, as a substitute for standard therapy. METHODS: We conducted two randomized, open-label noninferiority trials involving 2904 patients with deep-vein thrombosis and 2215 patients with pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux versus standard therapy. Patients received either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg once weekly) or a heparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for either 3 or 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (nonfatal or fatal). RESULTS: In the study of patients with deep venous thrombosis, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 2.9% in the idraparinux group as compared with 3.0% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.50), a result that satisfied the prespecified noninferiority requirement. At 6 months, the hazard ratio for idraparinux was 1.01. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding at day 92 were 4.5% in the idraparinux group and 7.0% in the standard-therapy group (P=0.004). At 6 months, bleeding rates were similar. In the study of patients with pulmonary embolism, the incidence of recurrence at day 92 was 3.4% in the idraparinux group and 1.6% in the standard-therapy group (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.78), a finding that did not meet the noninferiority requirement. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with deep venous thrombosis, once-weekly subcutaneous idraparinux for 3 or 6 months had an efficacy similar to that of heparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. However, in patients with pulmonary embolism, idraparinux was less efficacious than standard therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093 [ClinicalTrials.gov] and NCT00062803 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
机译:背景:静脉血栓栓塞症先用普通肝素或低分子量肝素治疗,然后再用维生素K拮抗剂治疗。我们研究了idraparinux(活化因子X的长效抑制剂)作为标准疗法的替代品的潜在用途。方法:我们进行了两项随机,开放标签的非劣效性试验,涉及2904例深静脉血栓形成患者和2215例肺栓塞患者,以比较伊德拉帕林与标准治疗的疗效和安全性。患者接受皮下注射伊德拉帕林(每周2.5 mg)或肝素,然后接受调整剂量的维生素K拮抗剂治疗3或6个月。主要疗效结果是有症状的复发性静脉血栓栓塞(非致命或致命)的3个月发生率。结果:在深静脉血栓形成患者的研究中,伊曲帕林组第92天的复发率为2.9%,而标准疗法组为3.0%(几率为0.98; 95%的置信区间[CI]) (从0.63到1.50),结果满足了预先指定的非劣性要求。在6个月时,伊德拉帕林的危险比是1.01。 idraparinux组在第92天的临床相关出血发生率为4.5%,标准治疗组为7.0%(P = 0.004)。在6个月时,出血率相似。在对肺栓塞患者的研究中,伊德拉帕新组第92天的复发发生率为3.4%,标准疗法组为1.6%(几率为2.14; 95%CI为1.21至3.78)。不符合非自卑要求。结论:对于深静脉血栓形成的患者,每周一次皮下注射伊达帕林3到6个月,其疗效与肝素加维生素K拮抗剂相似。但是,在患有肺栓塞的患者中,伊德拉帕新的疗效不如标准疗法。 (ClinicalTrials.gov号,NCT00067093 [ClinicalTrials.gov]和NCT00062803 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号