首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Dental Association >Do faxed quitline referrals add value to dental office-based tobacco-use cessation interventions?
【24h】

Do faxed quitline referrals add value to dental office-based tobacco-use cessation interventions?

机译:传真戒烟热线转诊是否为基于牙科诊所的戒烟干预措施增加了价值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Ask, Advise, Refer (AAR) model of intervening with patients who use tobacco promotes a brief office-based intervention plus referral to a tobacco quitline. However, there is little evidence that this model is effective. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on patients' tobacco use of two levels of a dental office-based intervention compared with usual care. METHODS: The authors randomly assigned 68 private dental clinics to one of three conditions: 5 As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange); 3 As (AAR model); or usual care, and they enrolled 2,160 participants. RESULTS: At the 12-month assessment, compared with those in usual care, participants in the two intervention conditions combined were more likely to report cessation of tobacco use, as measured by nine-month prolonged abstinence (3 percent versus 2 percent; F(1,66) = 3.97, P < .10) and 12-month point prevalence (12 percent versus 8 percent; F(1,66) = 7.32, P < .01). There were no significant differences between participants in the clinics using the 5 As and 3 As strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are inconclusive as to whether referrals to a quitline add value to brief dental office-based interventions. Patients receiving telephone counseling quit tobacco use at higher rates, but only a small percentage of those proactively referred actually received counseling. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results confirm those of previous research: that training dental practitioners to provide brief tobacco-use cessation advice and assistance results in a change in their behavior, and that these practitioners are effective in helping their patients to quit using tobacco.
机译:背景:对吸烟者进行干预的询问,咨询,转介(AAR)模型促进了基于办公室的简短干预以及转介烟草戒烟热线。但是,几乎没有证据表明该模型有效。这项研究的主要目的是评估两种水平的牙科诊所干预与常规护理相比对患者吸烟的影响。方法:作者随机分配68家私人牙科诊所为以下三种情况之一:5 As(询问,咨询,评估,协助,安排); 3 As(AAR模型);或常规护理,他们招募了2160名参与者。结果:在12个月的评估中,与常规护理相比,两种干预措施相结合的参与者更有可能报告停止吸烟,以9个月的长期禁欲来衡量(3%比2%; F( 1,66)= 3.97,P <.10)和12个月点患病率(12%比8%; F(1,66)= 7.32,P <.01)。使用5 As和3 As策略的临床参与者之间没有显着差异。结论:本研究的结果尚不确定,转介戒烟热线是否可为基于牙科诊所的简短干预增加价值。接受电话咨询的患者戒烟的比例更高,但只有一小部分主动转诊的患者实际接受了咨询。临床意义:结果证实了先前的研究结果:培训牙科从业人员提供简短的戒烟建议和协助会导致他们的行为发生变化,并且这些从业人员可以有效地帮助患者戒烟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号