首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Hemodynamic reactions in patients with hemorrhagic shock from blunt trauma after initial fluid therapy.
【24h】

Hemodynamic reactions in patients with hemorrhagic shock from blunt trauma after initial fluid therapy.

机译:初次液体疗法后钝性创伤引起的失血性休克患者的血流动力学反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECT: This study sought to define hemorrhagic shock from blood pressure and heart rate and then to provide a treatment policy based on response to initial fluid therapy. MATERIALS: This was a prospective clinical observational study conducted in eight hospitals. Subjects were consecutive patients with trauma who met any of the field triage conditions proposed by the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. Initial fluid therapy was performed in patients with suspected hemorrhagic shock. Patients who required blood transfusion >/= 4 U within 24 hours or interventions for active bleeding within 24 hours were classified into a "bleeding group" (B). A "nonbleeding group" (non-B) comprised patients who did not require blood transfusion >/= 4 U or other interventions within 24 hours. Our committee maintained the database of survey items. Four of the hospitals were selected at random to provide training data and that was used in a recursive partitioning analysis to predict the B group. Data on patients in the other four facilities were used for validation. RESULTS: There were a total of 400 patients studied. The training set consisted of 261 patients, 50 of whom were classified into the B group. A total of 94% patients with hemorrhagic shock suspected clinically, shock index at admission (first SI) >/= 0.8, and SI at 1 L of fluid resuscitation (second SI) >/= 1.0 were assigned to the B group. The non-B group (92%) were patients those whose first SI was < 0.8 and base deficits at admission >/= -1.0. Validation data consisted of 139 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of these data to predict the B group were 71%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose first SI was >/= 0.8 and second SI >/= 1.0 would be diagnosed as "nonresponders" by American College of Surgeons. Patients with first SI < 0.8 and base deficits >/= -1.0 will not be candidates for the B group.
机译:目的:本研究试图通过血压和心率来定义出血性休克,然后根据对初始液体疗法的反应提供治疗策略。材料:这是在八家医院进行的前瞻性临床观察研究。受试者是连续的创伤患者,符合美国外科医生学院创伤委员会提出的任何现场分类条件。怀疑有失血性休克的患者应进行初始输液治疗。需要在24小时内输血> / = 4 U或在24小时内进行活动性出血干预的患者被分类为“出血组”(B)。 “不出血组”(非B组)包括在24小时内不需要输血> / = 4 U或其他干预措施的患者。我们的委员会维护了调查项目的数据库。随机选择了四家医院来提供培训数据,并将其用于递归分区分析以预测B组。使用其他四个机构中的患者数据进行验证。结果:总共研究了400例患者。训练集包括261位患者,其中50位被归为B组。将总共​​94%的临床怀疑为失血性休克的患者,入院时的休克指数(第一SI)> / = 0.8,以及1 L液体复苏时的SI(第二SI)> / = 1.0的患者归为B组。非B组(92%)是那些最初的SI <0.8,入院时基础缺损> / =-1.0的患者。验证数据包括139例患者。这些数据可预测B组的敏感性,特异性和准确性分别为71%,93%和89%。结论:美国外科医生学院将其第一个SI> / = 0.8而第二个SI> / = 1.0的患者诊断为“无反应者”。最初SI <0.8,基础缺陷> / = -1.0的患者将不适合B组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号