首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Removal of the OplEase Retrievable Vena Cava Filter Is Not Feasible after Extended Time Periods Because of Filter Protrusion Through the Vena Cava
【24h】

Removal of the OplEase Retrievable Vena Cava Filter Is Not Feasible after Extended Time Periods Because of Filter Protrusion Through the Vena Cava

机译:由于过滤器通过静脉腔伸出,延长时间段后,无法拆卸OplEase可回收的静脉腔过滤器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Therapeutic and prophylactic vena cava filters (VCFs) are used to prevent pulmonary embolism. Concerns exist over placing a permanent filter in a young trauma patient. Recently, retrievable VCFs have become available. One such filter is the OptEase, which has a recommended time of removal of up to 23 days after insertion. Data supporting this recommendation are sparse. Many trauma patients will need filters for more than 2 weeks, and there are no data evaluating the safety of removal after extended time periods. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and reaction of the vena cava when removing the OptEase retrievable VCF at different time intervals.Twenty Yorkshire cross pigs (80-113 kg) underwent general anesthesia with tiletamine and zolazepam. Filters were placed in the infrarenal vena cava (VC) through the femoral vein under fluoroscopic guidance. Animals were then divided into four groups. In group 1, filters were removed at 14 days; in group 2, at 30 days; in group 3, at 60 days; and in group 4, at 90 days. Removal was attempted using a snare-and-sheath technique through the femoral vein. Animals with successful filter removal were allowed to recover; then, the animals underwent autopsy (gross and microscopic VC examination) 2 months later. Animals with unsuccessful filter removal underwent autopsy immediately after attempted removal. Venacavograms were taken at filter insertion, at removal, and before autopsy to evaluate any VC abnormalities.Successful removal of the filter in all five pigs (100%) was reliably performed only in the 14-day group. In this group, the initial VC transverse diameter was 19.4 (+-) 0.8 mm and was significantly reduced to 9.8 (+-) 1.1 mm (p < 0.05) immediately after removal. Sixty days later, before autopsy, VC diameter had increased to 15.3 (+-) 1.9 mm, which was significantly larger than at removal (p < 0.05) but not different from the initial value. In the 30-day group, removal was successful in only one of five animals. Although removal was successful in the one pig, autopsy at 2 months postremoval revealed total occlusion of the VC. Filters could not be removed from 60- and 90-day groups. At autopsy, the VCF struts were embedded or protruded through the VC wall. Microscopic examination of the VC revealed significant scarring underneath and between the struts.Removal of the retrievable OptEase VCF may be successfully performed up to 14 days after insertion. Strut protrusion through the VC wall prohibited successful and safe removal at extended time intervals.
机译:治疗性和预防性腔静脉滤器(VCF)用于预防肺栓塞。对于在年轻的创伤患者中放置永久性过滤器存在担忧。最近,可检索的VCF变得可用。 OptEase是此类过滤器之一,建议在插入后最多23天内将其移除。支持该建议的数据很少。许多创伤患者需要使用过滤器超过2周,并且没有数据评估长时间使用后的安全性。这项研究的目的是确定在不同时间间隔取出OptEase可回收VCF时腔静脉的安全性,可行性和反应。对二十只约克郡交叉猪(80-113公斤)进行了全麻麻醉,并使用了他汀和佐拉西ze。在荧光镜引导下,通过股静脉将滤器放置在肾下腔静脉(VC)中。然后将动物分为四组。在第1组中,第14天移除了过滤器;第2组,第30天;第3组,第60天;在第4组,共90天。尝试使用圈套技术通过股静脉切除。成功去除滤网的动物可以恢复;然后,在两个月后对动物进行尸检(肉眼和显微镜下的VC检查)。去除过滤器失败的动物在尝试去除后立即进行尸检。在滤器插入时,取出时和尸体解剖前进行静脉静脉造影,以评估任何VC异常。仅在14天组中,所有5头猪(100%)都成功地成功去除了滤器。在该组中,初始VC横向直径为19.4(±)0.8 mm,并且在去除后立即显着减小至9.8(±)1.1 mm(p <0.05)。六十天后,在尸检前,VC直径增加到15.3(±)1.9 mm,这明显大于切除时的直径(p <0.05),但与初始值没有差异。在30天组中,仅成功清除了五只动物中的一只。尽管对一只猪的清除成功,但是在清除后2个月的尸检显示完全封闭了VC。无法从60天和90天的小组中删除过滤器。尸检时,VCF支杆被嵌入或突出穿过VC壁。显微镜下检查VC时发现支杆下方和支杆之间有明显的疤痕。可取回的OptEase VCF可能在插入后最多14天成功完成。撑杆从VC壁伸出会阻止在延长的时间间隔内成功且安全地将其卸下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号