...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Use of hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in treatment of cerebral edema in patients with head trauma: experience at a single center.
【24h】

Use of hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in treatment of cerebral edema in patients with head trauma: experience at a single center.

机译:高渗盐水/醋酸盐输注治疗颅脑外伤患者脑水肿的经验:在一个中心的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hypertonic saline (HS) recently has been introduced as a new form of hyperosmolar treatment in patients with brain injury from diverse causes. We reviewed our experience with the use of continuous hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in patients with cerebral edema attributable to head trauma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted with severe head injury, defined as admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less, in the neurocritical care unit of a University hospital. Intravenous infusion of 2% or 3% saline/acetate for treatment of cerebral edema was introduced in the unit in April of 1993. The clinical characteristics, interventions required, and outcomes in patients who received HS were compared with patients who received 0.9% saline infusion only. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of HS use on in-hospital mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with cerebral edema caused by head trauma received infusion of HS initiated within 48 hours of admission for a mean period of 72 +/- 85 hours. Compared with 46 patients who did not receive HS, there were no differences observed in age and admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Patients who received HS were more likely to have a penetrating injury (p = 0.07) and a mass lesion on initial computed tomographic scan (p = 0.07). There was no difference between frequency of use of hyperventilation, mannitol, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and vasopressors between the two groups. The requirement for pentobarbital coma was higher in HS group (n = 7 patients) versus control group (n = 2,p = 0.04). After adjusting for differences between both groups, infusion of HS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-10.2). CONCLUSION: HS administration as prolonged infusion does not seem to favorably impact on requirement for other interventions and in-hospital mortality in our experience. Further efforts should be directed toward use of HS as bolus administrations or short infusions.
机译:背景:高渗盐水(HS)最近已被引入作为一种新形式的高渗疗法,用于各种原因引起的脑损伤患者。我们回顾了在因颅脑外伤引起的脑水肿患者中连续使用高渗盐水/醋酸盐输注的经验。方法:我们对大学医院神经重症监护病房中所有入院时定义为入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为8分或以下的严重颅脑损伤患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。 1993年4月,在该病房引入了静脉输注2%或3%的生理盐水/醋酸盐治疗脑水肿。将接受HS的患者的临床特征,所需的干预措施和结局与接受0.9%生理盐水的患者进行了比较。只要。多变量分析被用来评估HS对出院时住院死亡率和格拉斯哥成果量表评分的影响。结果:36例因颅脑外伤引起的脑水肿患者在入院48小时内接受了HS输注,平均时间为72 +/- 85小时。与未接受HS的46例患者相比,年龄和入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分均无差异。接受HS的患者在最初的计算机X线断层扫描中更有可能遭受穿透性损伤(p = 0.07)和肿块病变(p = 0.07)。两组之间换气过度,甘露醇,脑脊液引流和升压药的使用频率无差异。 HS组(n = 7例)对戊巴比妥昏迷的需要高于对照组(n = 2,p = 0.04)。调整两组之间的差异后,输注HS与更高的院内死亡率相关(OR,3.1; 95%CI,1.1-10.2)。结论:根据我们的经验,长时间输注HS似乎并不能很好地影响其他干预措施的需求和住院死亡率。应进一步努力将HS用作推注或短期输注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号