...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Adult versus pediatric prehospital trauma care: is there a difference?
【24h】

Adult versus pediatric prehospital trauma care: is there a difference?

机译:成人与儿科院前创伤护理:有区别吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Management of the injured child in the prehospital setting continues to be debated. Issues raised in the literature include time spent on scene, skill maintenance and performance, and reported poorer outcomes compared with adults. METHODS: Retrospective 2-year review of all pediatric (n = 232) and adult (n = 3,375) patients treated by a single emergency medical services agency and transported and admitted to a Level I trauma center. Patients were divided into two groups, pediatric (age 0 to 12 years) and adult (age >12 years) and further stratified into three Injury Severity Score subgroups; 1 to 15, 16 to 25, and more than 25. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in scene time for any of the groups. The percentage of patients with intravenous access or endotracheal intubation in the field and the mean Injury Severity Score were not different for the moderate or severely injured groups, although in the minor trauma group fewer pediatric patients had intravenous access or intubation performed. There were no differences in outcome for any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Paramedics are able to provide pediatric trauma patients a level of care comparable to that provided adult patients with similar outcome.
机译:背景:院前环境中受伤儿童的处理仍在争论中。文献中提出的问题包括在现场花费的时间,技能维护和表现,以及与成年人相比,报告的结果较差。方法:回顾性两年回顾性回顾了由单个紧急医疗服务机构治疗并运输并送至I级创伤中心的所有儿科(n = 232)和成人(n = 3,375)患者。将患者分为两类:儿科(0至12岁)和成人(年龄> 12岁),并进一步分为三个损伤严重度评分亚组。 1到15、16到25和超过25。结果:任何一组的场景时间都没有显着差异。对于中度或重度伤害组,现场进行静脉通路或气管插管的患者百分比和平均损伤严重程度得分没有差异,尽管在轻度创伤组中,进行静脉通路或插管的儿科患者较少。任何一组的结果均无差异。结论:护理人员能够为小儿创伤患者提供与成人患者相似的护理水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号