首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Effect of the modified glasgow coma scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified glasgow coma scale score model scores of 13.
【24h】

Effect of the modified glasgow coma scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified glasgow coma scale score model scores of 13.

机译:改良的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分标准对轻度外伤性脑损伤的死亡率预测的影响:比较经典和改良的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分模型得分为13。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: : The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) classifies traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) as mild (14-15), moderate (9-13), or severe (3-8). The Advanced Trauma Life Support modified this classification so that a GCS score of 13 is categorized as mild TBI. We investigated the effect of this modification on mortality prediction, comparing patients with a GCS score of 13 classified as moderate TBI (classic model) to patients with GCS score of 13 classified as mild TBI (modified model). METHODS: : We selected adult TBI patients from the Pennsylvania Outcome Study database. Logistic regressions adjusting for age, sex, cause, severity, trauma center level, comorbidities, and isolated TBI were performed. A second evaluation included the time trend of mortality. A third evaluation also included hypothermia, hypotension, mechanical ventilation, screening for drugs, and severity of TBI. Discrimination of the models was evaluated using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemershow goodness of fit test. RESULTS: : In the first evaluation, the AUCs were 0.922 (95% CI, 0.917-0.926) and 0.908 (95% CI, 0.903-0.912) for classic and modified models, respectively. Both models showed poor calibration (p < 0.001). In the third evaluation, the AUCs were 0.946 (95% CI, 0.943-0.949) and 0.938 (95% CI, 0.934-0.940) for the classic and modified models, respectively, with improvements in calibration (p = 0.30 and p = 0.02 for the classic and modified models, respectively). CONCLUSION: : The lack of overlap between receiver operating characteristic curves of both models reveals a statistically significant difference in their ability to predict mortality. The classic model demonstrated better goodness of fit than the modified model. A GCS score of 13 classified as moderate TBI in a multivariate logistic regression model performed better than a GCS score of 13 classified as mild.
机译:背景:格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)将创伤性脑损伤(TBI)分为轻度(14-15),中度(9-13)或严重(3-8)。高级创伤生命支持修改了此分类,因此GCS评分13归为轻度TBI。我们调查了这种修饰对死亡率预测的影响,将GCS评分为13的患者分类为中度TBI(经典模型)与GCS评分为13的患者分类为轻度TBI(改进模型)。方法::我们从宾夕法尼亚州结果研究数据库中选择了成年TBI患者。对年龄,性别,病因,严重程度,创伤中心水平,合并症和孤立的TBI进行逻辑回归分析。第二项评估包括死亡率的时间趋势。第三次评估还包括体温过低,低血压,机械通气,药物筛查和TBI严重程度。使用接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积评估模型的区分性。使用Hosmer-Lemershow拟合优度检验评估校准。结果:在第一次评估中,经典模型和改进模型的AUC分别为0.922(95%CI,0.917-0.926)和0.908(95%CI,0.903-0.912)。两种模型均显示出较差的校准(p <0.001)。在第三次评估中,经典模型和改进模型的AUC分别为0.946(95%CI,0.943-0.949)和0.938(95%CI,0.934-0.940),并且校准得到了改善(p = 0.30和p = 0.02)分别用于经典模型和改进模型)。结论:两种模型的受试者工作特征曲线之间没有重叠,这表明它们预测死亡率的能力在统计学上有显着差异。经典模型显示出比修改模型更好的拟合优度。在多元逻辑回归模型中,归类为中度TBI的GCS评分为13,优于归类为轻度的GCS评分为13。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号