首页> 外文期刊>The Korean Journal of Genetics >Phylogenetic relationship between Dendropanax morbifera leveille and D.trifidus makino (Araliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences
【24h】

Phylogenetic relationship between Dendropanax morbifera leveille and D.trifidus makino (Araliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences

机译:基于核糖体DNA内部转录间隔区(ITS)序列的Dendropanax morbifera leveille和D.trifidus makino(Araliaceae)之间的亲缘关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Dendropanax morbifera Leveille known as a Korean endemic plant and D. trifidus Makino distributed in Japan have been identified as different species. Some biologists have proposed that both plants should be considered as the same species based on their morphological resemblance, uncertainty of discrimination characters and previous molecular evidence revealed by RAPD analysis. Sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) regions of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) repeats were obtained from each species to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships. The comparison of ITS sequences in the two species through multiple alignments showed similarity between them. Especially, the sequence of Tsushima of D.trifidus Makino revealed 2 insertion/deletion fragments, one of those was 3 base pairs (bp) longer in ITSI region and the other was 21 bp longer in ITSII region. These fragments appeared only in Tsushima specimen, and moreover, were excluded in family Araliaceae. also, phylogenetic trees did not even make a difference inter-species but formed mixed branches. With these results, we are convinced that the two taxa are the same species, because they were indistinguishable.
机译:现已发现,被称为韩国特有植物的日本Dendropanax morbifera Leveille和分布于日本的D. trifidus Makino被确定为不同物种。一些生物学家提出,基于它们的形态相似性,区分特征的不确定性以及RAPD分析显示的先前分子证据,应将两种植物视为同一物种。从每个物种获得核糖体DNA(nrDNA)重复序列的内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域的序列,以重建系统发育关系。通过多重比对比较两个物种中的ITS序列,发现它们之间具有相似性。特别是,三歧马氏野蝇对马的序列揭示了2个插入/缺失片段,其中一个在ITSI区域中长3个碱基对(bp),而另一个在ITSII区域中长21bp。这些碎片仅在对马标本中出现,此外,在Ar科中被排除。同样,系统发育树甚至没有改变种间,但形成了混合的树枝。根据这些结果,我们确信这两个分类单元是同一物种,因为它们是无法区分的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号