首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Testosterone, Cardiovascular Risk, and Hormonophobia
【24h】

Testosterone, Cardiovascular Risk, and Hormonophobia

机译:睾丸激素,心血管疾病风险和恐惧症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction A public outcry against testosterone (T) therapy has suddenly occurred based on two reports suggesting treatment was associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risks. Aim To analyze scientific and social bases for concerns regarding T therapy. Methods Analysis of recent articles regarding CV risks with T and comparison with events surrounding publication of results of the Women's Health Initiative in 2002. Results In the first study, the percentage of individuals with an adverse event was lower by half in men who received T compared with untreated men (10.1% vs. 21.2%). However, an opposite conclusion was reached via complex statistics. The second study reported minor increased rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) up to 90 days after receiving a T prescription compared with the prior 12 months. However, there was no control group, so it is unknown whether this MI rate was increased, reduced, or unchanged compared with untreated men. Neither study provided substantive evidence of risk, yet these were lauded as proof of dangers, despite a substantial literature to the contrary. Similar events followed the publication of the Women's Health Initiative in 2002 when a media frenzy over increased risks with female hormone replacement therapy obscured the fact that the reported excess risk was clinically meaningless, at two events per 1,000person-years. Stakeholders driving concerns regarding hormone risks are unlikely to be clinicians with real-world patient experience. Conclusions The use of weak studies as proof of danger indicates that cultural (i.e., nonscientific) forces are at play. Negative media stories touting T's risks appear fueled by antipharma sentiment, anger against aggressive marketing, and antisexuality. This stance is best described as hormonophobia. As history shows, evidence alone may be insufficient to alter a public narrative. The true outrage is that social forces and hysteria have combined to deprive men of a useful treatment without regard for medical science. Morgentaler A. Testosterone, cardiovascular risk, and hormonophobia. J Sex Med 2014;11:1362-1366.
机译:引言根据两项报道表明治疗与心血管(CV)风险增加相关的报道,突然引发了公众对睾丸激素(T)治疗的强烈抗议。目的分析有关T疗法关注的科学和社会基础。方法对最近有关T的心血管风险的文章进行分析,并与2002年妇女健康倡议结果发布前后的事件进行比较。结果在第一项研究中,接受T的男性中发生不良事件的个体百分比降低了一半未治疗的男性(10.1%比21.2%)。但是,通过复杂的统计得出相反的结论。第二项研究报告说,与过去的12个月相比,接受T处方后90天内非致命性心肌梗塞(MI)的发生率略有增加。但是,由于没有对照组,因此与未接受治疗的男性相比,尚不知道MI的增加,减少或保持不变。两项研究都没有提供实质性的风险证据,尽管有大量相反的文献,但这些都被称赞为危险证据。类似的事件发生在2002年《妇女健康倡议》的发布上,当时媒体对女性激素替代疗法风险增加的狂热掩盖了这样一个事实,即报道的过量风险在临床上毫无意义,每千人年两次。引起人们对激素风险的担忧的利益相关者不太可能是具有现实患者经验的临床医生。结论使用薄弱的研究作为危险的证据表明,文化(即非科学)力量正在发挥作用。反制药情绪,对激进市场的愤怒和反性助长了吹捧T风险的负面媒体报道。最好将这种立场描述为恐怖症。如历史所示,仅凭证据可能不足以改变公众的叙述。真正的愤慨是,社会力量和歇斯底里相结合,剥夺了男人无视医学的有益治疗。 Morgentaler A.睾丸激素,心血管风险和恐惧恐怖症。 J Sex Med 2014; 11:1362-1366。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号