首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Erection hardness score for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: Further psychometric assessment in patients treated by intracavernous prostaglandins injections after radical prostatectomy
【24h】

Erection hardness score for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: Further psychometric assessment in patients treated by intracavernous prostaglandins injections after radical prostatectomy

机译:勃起硬度评分以评估勃起功能障碍:前列腺癌根治术后经海绵体内注射前列腺素治疗的患者的进一步心理计量学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life in patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item scale that has demonstrated good psychometric properties for assessing erectile function (EF) in patients treated by sildenafil, but its applicability to other treatment contexts has not yet been tested. Aim: This study aims to test the validity and time and treatment responsiveness of the EHS to assess ED in men with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections. Methods: This is a 1-year follow-up cohort study of 75 patients treated by RP for localized prostate cancer in a urology department setting between January 2007 and December 2008. Data were prospectively collected at 6 and 12 months post-RP. Main Outcome Measures: The EHS, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) reference questionnaire, the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ), and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) were collected. Convergent validity (Spearman correlation coefficients with IIEF domains), known-groups validity (comparing EHS scores across ED severity groups), time and treatment responsiveness (effect size with/without treatment and over the follow-up period), and predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC-ROC]) were analyzed for this study. Results: The EHS showed good convergent validity (all Spearman coefficients significant at the P<0.05 level), adequate known-groups validity (global differentiation between IIEF-EF severity groups; P<0.001), and treatment responsiveness (effect size: +1.8 [6 months], +2.1 [12 months]), but limited time responsiveness and predictive ability of the EHS for a normal EF at 12 months follow-up when compared with the IIEF-EF domain (AUC-ROC: 0.72 vs. 0.85; P<0.01). Conclusion: Our findings support the overall good psychometric properties of the EHS in patients with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections. However, evidence for limited predictive validity and responsiveness to change over time should be considered for its use in clinical follow-up in this population. Parisot J, Yiou R, Salomon L, de la Taille A, Lingombet O, and Audureau E. Erection hardness score for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: Further psychometric assessment in patients treated by intracavernous prostaglandins injections after radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2014;11:2109-2118.
机译:简介:勃起功能障碍(ED)影响根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗的患者的生活质量。勃起硬度评分(EHS)是单项量表,已显示出良好的心理计量学特性,可评估西地那非治疗的患者的勃起功能(EF),但尚未测试其在其他治疗环境中的适用性。目的:本研究旨在测试EHS的有效性,时间和治疗反应性,以评估前列地尔注射液治疗的RP后ED男性的ED。方法:这是一项为期1年的随访队列研究,研究对象是2007年1月至2008年12月在泌尿科的RP患者中接受过RP治疗的75例局限性前列腺癌患者。主要观察指标:收集EHS,国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)参考问卷,全球评估问卷(GAQ)和数字疼痛量表(NPS)。收敛效度(具有IIEF域的Spearman相关系数),已知人群的效度(比较ED严重程度组的EHS得分),时间和治疗反应性(有/无治疗以及随访期间的效应量)和预测能力(区域)在接收器工作特性曲线[AUC-ROC]下进行了分析。结果:EHS表现出良好的收敛效度(所有Spearman系数均在P <0.05水平上具有显着性),足够的已知人群效度(IIEF-EF严重程度组之间的总体差异; P <0.001)和治疗反应性(效应量:+1.8) [6个月],+ 2.1 [12个月]),但与IIEF-EF域相比,在12个月的随访中,EHS对正常EF的时间反应性和预测能力有限(AUC-ROC:0.72 vs. 0.85 ; P <0.01)。结论:我们的研究结果支持了前列地尔注射液治疗的RP后ED患者的EHS总体良好的心理计量学特征。但是,对于这一人群的临床随访,应考虑到有限的预测有效性和对随时间变化的反应性的证据。 Parisot J,Yiou R,Salomon L,de Taille A,Lingombet O和Audureau E.勃起硬度评分用于评估勃起功能障碍:在进行前列腺癌根治性切除术后,通过海绵体前列腺素注射治疗的患者需要进行进一步的心理测评。 J Sex Med 2014; 11:2109-2118。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号