首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Is one question enough to detect female sexual dysfunctions? A diagnostic accuracy study in 6,194 women.
【24h】

Is one question enough to detect female sexual dysfunctions? A diagnostic accuracy study in 6,194 women.

机译:一个问题足以检测女性性功能障碍吗?对6,194名妇女的诊断准确性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Literature shows that recognition of sexual dysfunctions in women is insufficient and existing instruments to aid detection are mostly too extensive to be used in routine practice. AIM: To develop a brief and accurate screening instrument to detect female sexual dysfunctions in routine care. METHODS: The initial item pool for the index test consisted of 15 items. In a 4-year period, a total of 12,957 persons filled out the test on a specifically designed web-site. Six thousand one hundred ninety-four complete data sets could be used for statistical analysis. The validated German version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) served as reference standard to estimate the accuracy of the screening test. In order to test several possible ways of combining items a multi-step procedure employing univariate analyses, multiple logistic regression, and classification and regression tree analysis was applied to a learning sample and cross-validated in a test sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio as well as adjusted odds ratio) of the items and resulting models to discriminate women with sexual dysfunction from those without were calculated. RESULTS: One dichotomous question for overall satisfaction proved to show high accuracy as a stand-alone instrument and played also a central role in multivariate models. It may be recommended as a one-question screening test (76.4% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity in the test sample). A hierarchical two-question test yielded higher sensitivity (93.5%) and lower specificity (60.1%). A slightly more extensive version consists of five questions (83.1% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some methodological limitations of our study all developed tests showed acceptable to good diagnostic performance, all are very short and could therefore be easily implemented into routine care. Further tests of psychometric properties in other settings are needed.
机译:简介:文献表明,女性对性功能障碍的认识尚不充分,现有的辅助检测工具大多过于广泛,无法在常规实践中使用。目的:开发一种简短而准确的筛查工具,以检测常规护理中的女性性功能障碍。方法:用于索引测试的初始项目池由15个项目组成。在4年的时间里,共有12,957人在专门设计的网站上填写了测试。可以将694个完整的数据集用于统计分析。经验证的德语版女性性功能指数(FSFI-d)作为参考标准,用于评估筛查测试的准确性。为了测试组合项目的几种可能方式,将采用单变量分析,多逻辑回归以及分类和回归树分析的多步骤过程应用于学习样本,并在测试样本中进行交叉验证。主要观察指标:计算项目的诊断性能(敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值,准确性,诊断比值比以及调整的比值比)和所得模型,以区分具有性功能障碍的女性与没有性功能障碍的女性。结果:总体满意度的一个二分式问题证明了作为独立工具具有很高的准确性,并且在多元模型中也发挥了核心作用。可以建议将其作为一个问题的筛选测试(测试样品中的灵敏度为76.4%,特异性为76.5%)。分层的两个问题测试产生更高的灵敏度(93.5%)和更低的特异性(60.1%)。稍宽一些的版本包含五个问题(敏感性为83.1%,特异性为81.2%)。结论:尽管我们的研究在方法上有局限性,但所有开发的测试均显示出良好的诊断性能可接受,但均很短,因此很容易在常规护理中实施。需要在其他环境中进一步测试心理测量特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号