首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Men and Women With Sexual Dysfunctions-A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials: Part 2-The Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions for Female Sexual Dysfunction Günzler and Berner Psychosocial Interventions in Female Sexual Dysfunction
【24h】

Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Men and Women With Sexual Dysfunctions-A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials: Part 2-The Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions for Female Sexual Dysfunction Günzler and Berner Psychosocial Interventions in Female Sexual Dysfunction

机译:男性和女性性功能障碍的心理干预功效-对照临床试验的系统评价:第2部分-女性性功能障碍的Günzler和Berner心理社会干预的女性心理干预的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: As yet, a summary of the research evidence concerning the efficacy of psychological treatment in female sexual dysfunction is lacking. Previous reviews were often nonsystematic or explored one specific sexual dysfunction. Aim: Our systematic review provides an overview of the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in all female sexual dysfunction. Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures included for example psychometrically validated scales, diary notes, interviews, and vulvar algesiometer. The efficacy of psychosocial interventions was measured for example by the frequency of and satisfaction with sexual activity and sexual functioning. Safety and acceptance were evaluated on the basis of adverse events and dropout rates. Methods: The systematic literature search included electronic database search, handsearch, contact with experts, and an ancestry approach. Studies were included if the woman was given a formal diagnosis of a sexual dysfunction (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-ICD10/-9; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV/-III-R) and when the intervention was psychosocial or psychotherapeutic. The control group included either another treatment or a waiting-list control group. The report of relevant outcomes was necessary for inclusion as well as the design of the study (randomized, controlled trials [RCTs] and controlled clinical trials). The assessment of methodological quality comprised aspects of randomization, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and allegiance. Results: We identified 15 RCTs that investigated efficacy in female sexual dysfunction and two further studies that examined male and female sexual dysfunction together. Most trials explored sexual pain disorders. About half of all studies in women used either a concept derived from Masters and Johnson or a cognitive-behavioral treatment program. Both approaches showed significant improvements compared with a control group. Benefit was not always maintained over the (variable) follow-up period. Conclusions: Traditional sexual therapeutic concepts proved to be efficacious in the treatment of female sexual dysfunction. A shortcoming was the rather low methodological quality of included studies. Günzler C, and Berner MM. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions in men and women with sexual dysfunctions-A systematic review of controlled clinical trials.
机译:简介:迄今为止,尚缺乏有关心理治疗对女性性功能障碍的疗效的研究证据的总结。以前的评论通常是非系统性的,或探讨了一种特定的性功能障碍。目的:我们的系统评价概述了社会心理干预对所有女性性功能障碍的疗效。主要结局指标:主要结局指标包括心理验证量表,日记笔记,访谈和外阴法。例如,通过性活动和性功能的频率以及对性活动和性功能的满意度来衡量社会心理干预的有效性。根据不良事件和辍学率评估安全性和可接受性。方法:系统的文献搜索包括电子数据库搜索,手工搜索,与专家联系以及祖先方法。如果对该妇女进行了正式的性功能障碍诊断,则包括研究(国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类-ICD10 / -9;精神障碍诊断和统计手册-IV / -III-R)以及何时进行干预是社会心理或心理治疗。对照组包括另一种治疗或等候名单对照组。相关结果的报告对于纳入研究以及设计(随机,对照试验[RCT]和对照临床试验)都是必要的。方法学质量评估包括随机化,盲法,不完整的结果数据,选择性报告和效忠方面。结果:我们确定了15项研究女性性功能障碍功效的RCT,以及两项进一步研究了男性和女性性功能障碍的研究。大多数试验都探讨了性疼痛疾病。在所有女性研究中,大约有一半使用的是源自Masters and Johnson的概念或认知行为治疗计划。与对照组相比,两种方法均显示出显着改善。在(可变)随访期内,收益并不总是保持不变。结论:传统的性治疗概念已被证明可有效治疗女性性功能障碍。缺点是纳入研究的方法学质量较低。 GünzlerC和Berner MM。社会功能干预对男女性功能障碍的疗效-对照临床试验的系统评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号