首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparing prostate specific antigen outcomes after different types of radiotherapy management of clinically localized prostate cancer highlights the importance of controlling for established prognostic factors.
【24h】

Comparing prostate specific antigen outcomes after different types of radiotherapy management of clinically localized prostate cancer highlights the importance of controlling for established prognostic factors.

机译:在临床定​​位的前列腺癌的不同类型的放射治疗后,比较前列腺特异性抗原的结果强调了控制已建立的预后因素的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact that the composition of prognostic factors in a patient cohort may have on prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome following external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distribution of PSA, biopsy Gleason score and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage in men with prostate cancer treated with interstitial plus external beam radiation therapy was used to select a matched cohort who underwent 3-dimensional (D) conformal external beam radiation therapy. We compared PSA outcomes after 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy in the overall and matched cohorts of 766 and 570 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Men treated with interstitial plus external beam radiation therapy had a significantly lower rate of PSA greater than 10 to 20 (p = 0. 02) and greater than 20 ng./ml. (p <0.0001), biopsy Gleason score 7 (p = 0.02) and 8 to 10 (p <0.0001), and AJCC stage T2c disease (p <0. 0001). Likewise, these men also had a significantly higher rate of PSA greater than 4 to 10 ng./ml. (p <0.0001), biopsy Gleason score 5 to 6 (p = 0.0001) and AJCC stage T1 disease (p <0.0001) than those who underwent 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy. The 5-year estimate of PSA failure-free survival after 3-D conformal external beam radiation therapy was 45% versus 67% (p = 0.0007) for all 766 consecutively treated patients and the matched cohort of 570, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of prognostic factors in a patient cohort may impact PSA outcome. Therefore, controlling for established prognostic factors is essential when comparing PSA outcome after different forms of radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
机译:目的:我们评估了患者队列中预后因素的组成可能对临床上局限性前列腺癌的外照射治疗后对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)结局的影响。材料与方法:采用间质加外照射治疗的前列腺癌男性患者的PSA分布,活检Gleason评分和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)T分期的分布,用于选择进行了3维(D )保形外部束放射疗法。我们比较了3D保形外部束放射治疗后PSA的结果,分别对766名和570名患者的总体和配对队列进行了比较。结果:经间隙加外照射治疗的男性PSA率明显低于10至20(p = 0. 02)和20 ng./ml。 (p <0.0001),活检格里森评分7(p = 0.02)和8到10(p <0.0001),以及AJCC T2c期疾病(p <0。0001)。同样,这些人的PSA率也明显高于4至10 ng./ml。 (p <0.0001),活检格里森评分5到6(p = 0.0001)和AJCC T1期疾病(p <0.0001),比接受3-D保形外照射治疗的患者高。对于所有766名连续接受治疗的患者和相匹配的队列,分别进行了3-D保形外部束放射治疗后5年的PSA无故障存活率估计分别为45%和67%(p = 0.0007)。结论:患者队列中预后因素的组成可能会影响PSA结局。因此,在比较不同形式的前列腺癌放射治疗后的PSA结果时,控制已建立的预后因素至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号