首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Treatment choice for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a matter of urologist preference?
【24h】

Treatment choice for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a matter of urologist preference?

机译:良性前列腺增生的治疗选择:泌尿科医生的偏好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: New treatment modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have considerably altered the decision making process in daily clinical practice. Guidelines provide a framework for treatment choice but leave much room for physician personal opinions. We identified and quantified determinants of treatment choice for BPH among urologists focusing on urologist treatment preferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 670 consecutive patients with BPH 50 years old or older newly referred to 1 of 39 urologists in a stratified sample of 13 hospitals throughout The Netherlands. Data on patient characteristics were retrieved from patient questionnaires (symptomatology, bothersomeness, sexual function), medical records (diagnostic outcomes, co-morbidity) and urologist questionnaire (initial treatment choice and main considerations for this decision). Urologist treatment preferences were inventoried using a mailed questionnaire. Polychotomous logistic regression analysis was used to study the impact of patient characteristics and urologist preferences on treatment choice. RESULTS: Among the patient characteristics maximum flow rate, residual urine and prostate volume were strongly associated with the probability of surgery and watchful waiting. However, the influence of urologist preferences on actual decisions was also significant. Adjusted for case mix the differences in low and high preferences revealed a 2.2 times greater probability of surgery. For alpha-blockers and finasteride these ratios were 1.8 and 9.4, respectively. An additional independent effect was seen for urologist extent of experience. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of urologist personal preferences on treatment choice in BPH is considerable. Given the different efficacy and side effects of the various treatments, further consensus development is needed to enhance appropriate treatment decisions and eliminate undue costs.
机译:目的:良性前列腺增生(BPH)的新治疗方式已大大改变了日常临床实践中的决策过程。指南提供了治疗选择的框架,但给医生个人意见留下了很大的空间。我们确定并量化了泌尿科医师中BPH治疗选择的决定因素,重点关注泌尿科医师的治疗偏好。材料和方法:研究人群包括荷兰全国13所医院的分层样本中的670名连续BPH 50岁或以上的患者,这些患者是新转诊的39名泌尿科医师中的1名。从患者调查表(症状,不适,性功能),病历(诊断结果,合并症)和泌尿科医师调查表(初始治疗选择和此决定的主要考虑因素)中检索出有关患者特征的数据。使用邮寄问卷调查了泌尿科医师的治疗偏好。多因素逻辑回归分析用于研究患者特征和泌尿科医师偏好对治疗选择的影响。结果:在患者特征最大流速,残余尿液和前列腺体积中,与手术和观察等待的可能性密切相关。但是,泌尿科医生的喜好对实际决定的影响也很大。调整病例组合后,低偏好和高偏好的差异显示出手术的可能性是后者的2.2倍。对于α-受体阻滞剂和非那雄胺,这些比率分别为1.8和9.4。对于泌尿科医师的经验范围,可以看到另外的独立作用。结论:泌尿外科医师个人喜好对BPH治疗选择的影响很大。鉴于各种治疗方法的功效和副作用不同,需要进一步达成共识,以增强适当的治疗决策并消除不必要的费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号