首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Focal neuroendocrine differentiation lacks prognostic significance in prostate core needle biopsies.
【24h】

Focal neuroendocrine differentiation lacks prognostic significance in prostate core needle biopsies.

机译:局灶性神经内分泌分化在前列腺核心穿刺活检中缺乏预后意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: The biological behavior of prostate cancer is highly variable and cannot sufficiently be predicted by histological criteria alone. New prognostic factors are needed in core needle biopsies before initial treatment decisions. We investigate the prognostic significance of focal neuroendocrine differentiation in core needle biopsies of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Core needle biopsies from 105 untreated patients (mean age 71 years) were immunohistochemically examined for focal neuroendocrine differentiation using an antibody against chromogranin A. Tumor cell proliferation was assessed with Ki-67 labeling index using MIB 1 antibody. The cause of death was determined by examination of records including autopsy reports. RESULTS: Focal neuroendocrine differentiation was found in 25% of the tumors. There was no association between the presence of focal neuroendocrine differentiation and Gleason score or Ki-67 labeling index. Tumor specific survival analysis revealed that high Gleason score and high Ki-67 labeling index were predictors of tumor specific death, whereas focal neuroendocrine differentiation failed to provide prognostic information. There was a significant increase in frequency and density of neuroendocrine differentiation between initial core needle biopsies and later specimens of secondary hormone resistant prostate cancer in 15 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to high Gleason score and high Ki-67 labeling index, focal neuroendocrine differentiation is not a prognostic factor in core needle biopsies of prostate cancer. Focal neuroendocrine differentiation seems to appear more frequently and intensively in hormone resistant prostate cancer, supporting a role of neuroendocrine cells in the development of hormone refractory disease.
机译:目的:前列腺癌的生物学行为是高度可变的,仅靠组织学标准不能充分预测。在做出初始治疗决定之前,核心针穿刺活检需要新的预后因素。我们调查在前列腺癌的核心针活检中局灶性神经内分泌分化的预后意义。材料与方法:使用抗嗜铬粒蛋白A抗体对105例未经治疗的患者(平均年龄71岁)的核心针穿刺活检进行了免疫组织化学检查,以了解局灶性神经内分泌分化。使用MIB 1抗体通过Ki-67标记指数评估了肿瘤细胞的增殖。通过检查包括尸检报告在内的记录确定死亡原因。结果:在25%的肿瘤中发现了局灶性神经内分泌分化。局灶性神经内分泌分化的存在与格里森评分或Ki-67标记指数之间没有关联。肿瘤特异性生存分析表明,高格里森评分和高Ki-67标记指数是肿瘤特异性死亡的预测因素,而局灶性神经内分泌分化未能提供预后信息。在最初的核心针穿刺活检和后来的继发性激素抵抗性前列腺癌标本之间,神经内分泌分化的频率和密度显着增加了15例患者。结论:与高格里森评分和高Ki-67标记指数相比,局灶性神经内分泌分化不是前列腺癌核心针穿刺活检的预后因素。局灶性神经内分泌分化似乎在激素抵抗性前列腺癌中更频繁,更集中地出现,支持了神经内分泌细胞在激素难治性疾病发展中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号