首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
【24h】

Outcomes following repeat mid urethral synthetic sling after failure of the initial sling procedure: rediscovery of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.

机译:最初的吊带操作失败后,重复进行尿道中段合成带后的结果:重新发现无张力的阴道胶带操作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We evaluated outcomes of the repeat mid urethral sling to treat recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence after failure of an initial mid urethral sling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients who underwent the repeat mid urethral sling procedure due to persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Repeat slings were placed without removal of the previous sling. All patients were followed at least 1 year after the second mid urethral sling. RESULTS: Of the 31 female patients with a repeat mid urethral sling 29 were followed, including 13 with a retropubic and 16 with a transobturator sling. For the first mid urethral sling 17 patients received a retropubic sling (tension-free vaginal tape) and 12 received a transobturator sling (6 inside out and 6 outside in procedures). Cure and improvement rates irrespective of the approach were 75.9% (22 of 29 patients) and 6.9% (2 of 29), respectively. Cure rates for the retropubic and transobturator slings were 92.3% (12 of 13 patients) and 62.5% (10 of 16), respectively, a difference that did not quite attain statistical significance (p = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: The repeat mid urethral sling for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence has a lower cure rate than the initial sling. However, the retropubic approach tends to have a higher cure rate than the transobturator approach in repeat sling cases.
机译:目的:我们评估了初次输尿管中段吊带失败后再次尿道中段吊带治疗复发性或持续性压力性尿失禁的疗效。材料与方法:我们回顾性分析了因持续性或反复性压力性尿失禁而进行了重复中段尿道吊带术的患者的数据。放置重复的吊索,而不会移除先前的吊索。所有患者均在第二次中尿道吊带术后至少1年接受随访。结果:在31例女性患者中,重复行尿道中段吊带29例,其中13例耻骨后吊和16例经闭孔吊带。对于第一个中段尿道吊带,有17例患者接受了耻骨后吊带(无张力阴道带),有12例接受了经闭孔吊带(手术过程中,内向外6例)。无论采用哪种方法,治愈率和改善率分别为75.9%(29例患者中的22例)和6.9%(29例患者中的2例)。耻骨后和经闭孔吊带的治愈率分别为92.3%(13例患者中的12例)和62.5%(16例患者中的10例),差异并未达到统计学显着性(p = 0.089)。结论:对于持续性或反复性压力性尿失禁,重复尿道中段吊带的治愈率低于初始吊带。但是,在反复吊带的情况下,耻骨后入路的治愈率往往比经闭孔法高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号