首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors.
【24h】

In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors.

机译:超声碎石机的体外评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Ultrasonic lithotriptors are commonly used to fragment and remove stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To date a comparative assessment of current units has not been accomplished without potential operator bias. An objective testing environment is required for optimal appraisal of the efficiency of ultrasonic lithotriptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro test system was devised to evaluate the ability of ultrasonic lithotriptors to core through artificial stones. The system consisted of an irrigation sheath (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) through which ultrasonic probes were placed. Ultrasonic hand pieces and probes were secured in an upright position. An Ultracal-30 (U.S. Gypsum, Chicago, Illinois) stone cylinder (mean length 12.8 +/- 0.6 mm, mean diameter 7.6 +/- 0.07 mm) was centered on the probe tip. A weight (62.7 gm) was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. We evaluated the Olympus LUS-1 and LUS-2 (Olympus, Melville, New York), Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (Circon-ACMI, Southborough, Massachusetts), Karl Storz Calcuson (Karl Storz, Culver City, California) and Richard Wolf model 2271.004 (Richard Wolf, Vernon Hills, Illinois). All probes had outer diameters of 3.4 mm except for the Circon-ACMI unit (3.8 mm). Using 100% power settings times for complete stone penetration were assessed for all units. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: The Olympus LUS-2 had the fastest mean stone penetration time (28.8 +/- 2.7 seconds). This value was used to normalize the data into efficiency ratios, where other unit times were expressed as multiples of the LUS-2 time: Olympus LUS-2 (1.0 +/- 0.1) equals Circon-ACMI USL-2000 (1.1 +/- 0.3) greater than Karl Storz Calcuson (1.4 +/- 0.3) greater than Olympus LUS-1 (2.1 +/- 0.5) greater than Richard Wolf (3.6 +/- 0.8). Efficiencies of the LUS-2 and USL-2000 units were essentially equivalent, with all others significantly less efficient (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This new in vitro testing modelprovides an objective, reproducible method for evaluating the efficiency of intracorporeal lithotriptors. Of the units tested the Olympus LUS-2 and Circon-ACMI USL-2000 were the most efficient.
机译:目的:超声碎石术通常用于经皮肾镜取石术中碎石和去除结石。迄今为止,在没有潜在的操作者偏见的情况下,尚未完成对当前单位的比较评估。需要客观的测试环境以最佳评估超声碎石机的效率。材料与方法:设计了一种体外测试系统,以评估超声碎石机通过人造石芯的能力。该系统由一个灌溉套(Cook Urologic,Spencer,印第安纳州)组成,超声波探头通过该灌溉套放置。超声波手持件和探头固定在直立位置。将Ultracal-30(美国石膏,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)石圆柱(平均长度12.8 +/- 0.6毫米,平均直径7.6 +/- 0.07毫米)居中于探针尖端。将一块重物(62.7克)放在石头上,以提供恒定的力。我们评估了奥林巴斯LUS-1和LUS-2(奥林巴斯,梅尔维尔,纽约),Circon-ACMI USL-2000(Circon-ACMI,马萨诸塞州绍斯伯勒),Karl Storz Calcuson(Karl Storz,加利福尼亚州卡尔弗市)和理查德狼模型2271.004(伊利诺伊州弗农山庄的理查德·沃尔夫)。除Circon-ACMI装置(3.8毫米)外,所有探针的外径均为3.4毫米。使用100%的功率设置时间评估了所有设备的完整石材渗透时间。使用方差分析比较平均石头穿透时间的差异。结果:Olympus LUS-2的平均石质渗透时间最快(28.8 +/- 2.7秒)。该值用于将数据标准化为效率比,其中其他单位时间表示为LUS-2时间的倍数:奥林巴斯LUS-2(1.0 +/- 0.1)等于Circon-ACMI USL-2000(1.1 +/-)比Karl Storz Calcuson(1.4 +/- 0.3)大0.3倍,比Olympus LUS-1(2.1 +/- 0.5)大,比Richard Wolf(3.6 +/- 0.8)大。 LUS-2和USL-2000装置的效率基本相同,所有其他装置的效率均显着较低(p <0.05)。结论:这种新的体外测试模型提供了一种客观的,可重复的方法来评估体内碎石者的效率。在测试的单元中,奥林巴斯LUS-2和Circon-ACMI USL-2000效率最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号