首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine.
【24h】

A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine.

机译:比较BTA stat,血红蛋白试纸,端粒酶和Vysis UroVysion检测尿中尿路上皮癌的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: We determine the sensitivity and specificity of various assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 voided urine specimens from 265 patients were obtained immediately before cystoscopy for BTA stat, (Bard Diagnostic, Redmond, Washington) hemoglobin dipstick, (Bayer, Elkhart, Indiana) telomerase and UroVysion (Vysis, a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) analysis. RESULTS: Of the 265 patients 75 had biopsy proven urothelial carcinoma, and the sensitivity of the assays was determined from these patients. From most sensitive to least sensitive, the overall sensitivity of UroVysion (73 cases), BTA stat (72), hemoglobin dipstick (73) and telomerase (70) was 81%, 78%, 74%, and 46%, respectively. Each of the first 3 tests was statistically significantly more sensitive than the telomerase assay (p <0.05). However, the differences in overall sensitivity of UroVysion, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick were not statistically significant. The specificity of the tests was calculated for 80 of the 265 patients in this study who had no history of urothelial carcinoma and negative cystoscopy findings despite common urological complaints. From most specific to least specific, the specificity of UroVysion, telomerase, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick was 96%, 91%, 74% and 51%, respectively. UroVysion and telomerase were statistically significantly (p <0.01) more specific than the BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick assays, and all of the assays were more specific than hemoglobin dipstick testing (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that UroVysion is the most sensitive and specific assay among those tested for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Telomerase testing had good specificity but poor sensitivity. The BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick tests had good sensitivity but relatively poor specificity. UroVysion is a promising new assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. However, further studies are needed to explore the role of the various assays in the treatment of patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma.
机译:目的:我们确定各种检测尿路上皮癌的方法的敏感性和特异性。材料与方法:膀胱镜检查前即刻(Bard Diagnostic,Redmond,华盛顿)的血红蛋白试纸,Bayer,Elkhart,印第安纳州的端粒酶和UroVysion(Vysis,全资拥有)从膀胱镜检查前共获得了265例患者的280份排尿尿标本。分析)。结果:在265名患者中,有75名经活检证实为尿路上皮癌,并从这些患者中确定了测定的敏感性。从最敏感到最不敏感,UroVysion(73例),BTA stat(72),血红蛋白试纸(73)和端粒酶(70)的总体敏感性分别为81%,78%,74%和46%。从统计上来说,前3个测试中的每一个均比端粒酶测定具有更高的敏感性(p <0.05)。但是,UroVysion,BTA stat和血红蛋白试纸的总体敏感性差异无统计学意义。计算了该研究中265例患者中的80例的特异性,这些患者尽管有泌尿科常见病但无泌尿上皮癌病史和膀胱镜检查阴性。从最具体到最不具体,UroVysion,端粒酶,BTA stat和血红蛋白试纸的特异性分别为96%,91%,74%和51%。 UroVysion和端粒酶在统计学上比BTA stat和血红蛋白试纸法具有更高的特异性(p <0.01),并且所有测定都比血红蛋白试纸法具有更高的特异性(p <0.001)。结论:我们的研究表明,UroVysion是尿路上皮癌检测中最灵敏,最特异性的检测方法。端粒酶检测具有良好的特异性,但敏感性较差。 BTA stat和血红蛋白试纸测试灵敏度高,但特异性相对差。 UroVysion是用于检测尿液标本中尿路上皮癌的新方法。然而,需要进一步的研究来探索各种测定法在浅表尿路上皮癌患者治疗中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号