首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Dead men tell no tales: Analysis of the use of autopsy reports in trauma system performance improvement activities
【24h】

Dead men tell no tales: Analysis of the use of autopsy reports in trauma system performance improvement activities

机译:死者不讲任何故事:尸检报告在创伤系统性能改善活动中的使用分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence and use of autopsy report review on preventability judgments as part of trauma system performance improvement activities. Methods: All cases trauma fatalities occurring across one state within 1 year were reviewed. Preventability judgments were first analyzed by multidisciplinary panel consensus without benefit of autopsy report. Deaths were then reanalyzed after the panel was provided with autopsy findings. Changes in panel determinations of preventability and cause of death were noted. Results: A total of 434 cases were reviewed, autopsies were performed in 240 (55%) patients. Autopsy rate was 83% for prehospital deaths (PHDs) and 37% for hospital deaths (HDs). A complete examination (CA) was performed in 166 (69%) cases, and 74 (31%) cases were limited internal or external examinations only (NCA). Of autopsies performed on HD, 60% were CA versus 75% in PHD. Autopsy review changed preventability determination in four cases (1%). All changes were from nonpreventable to possibly preventable. For all patients with autopsy, the panel felt that the autopsy should have been of sufficient quality to analyze the cause of death in 83%. The autopsy was felt to actually establish a specific cause of death in 70% of all patients with autopsy, 71% in patients with NCA, and 74% in patients with CA. The autopsy changed the panel's preautopsy review-determination cause of death in 31% of all patients with autopsy (37% in the CA group; 13% in the NCA group). For PHD, autopsy changed the panel-determination cause of death in 44% and in 13% for HD. Conclusion: Review of autopsy reports adds little to the trauma performance improvement process. It does not significantly change death review panel determinations. It may, perhaps, be most useful in PHD. Ardent initiatives to expend resources on autopsy performance and acquisition of autopsy reports in all patients with trauma is unwarranted.
机译:目的:分析尸检报告审查对预防性判断的影响和使用,作为创伤系统性能改善活动的一部分。方法:回顾了在一年之内发生在一个州的所有创伤死亡病例。首先通过多学科小组共识对可预防性判断进行分析,而没有尸检报告的益处。在向小组提供尸检结果后,再次分析了死亡情况。注意到专家组确定的可预防性和死亡原因的变化。结果:共检查434例,对240例(55%)患者进行了尸检。院前死亡(PHD)的尸检率为83%,医院死亡(HDs)的尸检率为37%。 166例(69%)病例进行了完整检查(CA),仅内部或外部有限检查(NCA)进行了74例(31%)。在HD进行的尸检中,CA为60%,PHD为75%。尸检复查改变了四种情况下的可预防性确定(1%)。所有更改都是从无法预防到可以预防的。对于所有进行尸检的患者,专家组认为,进行尸检的质量足以分析83%的死亡原因。尸检被认为实际上确定了所有尸检患者中70%的死亡原因,NCA患者中71%以及CA患者中74%。尸检改变了所有尸检患者中31%的小组的尸检前复查确定死亡原因(CA组为37%; NCA组为13%)。对于PHD,尸检改变了小组确定的死亡原因,对于HD而言,这一比例为44%,而对HD为13%。结论:尸检报告的回顾几乎没有改善创伤表现。它不会显着改变死亡审查小组的决定。它可能在PHD中最有用。没有必要采取急切措施来在所有创伤患者中花费大量资源进行尸检,并获得尸检报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号