首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Do one-time intracompartmental pressure measurements have a high false-positive rate in diagnosing compartment syndrome?
【24h】

Do one-time intracompartmental pressure measurements have a high false-positive rate in diagnosing compartment syndrome?

机译:一次性的车厢内压力测量在诊断车厢综合症中是否有很高的假阳性率?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intracompartmental pressure measurements are frequently used in the diagnosis of compartment syndrome, particularly in patients with equivocal or limited physical examination findings. Little clinical work has been done to validate the clinical use of intracompartmental pressures or identify associated false-positive rates. We hypothesized that diagnosis of compartment syndrome based on one-time pressure measurements alone is associated with a high false-positive rate. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients with tibial shaft fractures who were not suspected of having compartment syndrome based on physical examinations were prospectively enrolled. Pressure measurements were obtained in all four compartments at a single point in time immediately after induction of anesthesia using a pressure-monitoring device. Preoperative and intraoperative blood pressure measurements were recorded. The same standardized examination was performed by the attending surgeon preoperatively, postoperatively, and during clinical follow-up for 6 months to assess clinical evidence of acute or late compartment syndrome. RESULTS: No clinical evidence of compartment syndrome was observed postoperatively or during follow-up until 6 months after injury. Using the accepted criteria of delta P of 30 mm Hg from preoperative diastolic blood pressure, 35% of cases (n = 16; 95% confidence interval, 21.5-48.5%) met criteria for compartment syndrome. Raising the threshold to delta P of 20 mm Hg reduced the false-positive rate to 24% (n = 11; 95% confidence interval, 11.1-34.9%). Twenty-two percent (n = 10; 95% confidence interval, 9.5-32.5%) exceeded absolute pressure of 45 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: A 35% false-positive rate was found for the diagnosis of compartment syndrome in patients with tibial shaft fractures who were not thought to have compartment syndrome by using currently accepted criteria for diagnosis based solely on one-time compartment pressure measurements. Our data suggest that reliance on one-time intracompartmental pressure measurements can overestimate the rate of compartment syndrome and raise concern regarding unnecessary fasciotomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II.
机译:背景:房内压力测量常用于房室综合征的诊断,尤其是在体格检查结果模糊或有限的患者中。很少有临床工作可以验证房内压的临床使用或确定相关的假阳性率。我们假设仅基于一次性压力测量的车厢综合症诊断与高假阳性率相关。方法:前瞻性纳入了48例连续的胫骨干骨折患者,这些患者经身体检查均未怀疑患有房室综合征。麻醉诱导后立即使用压力监测装置在单个时间点在所有四个隔室中获得压力测量值。记录术前和术中血压测量值。主治医生在术前,术后和临床随访期间进行了相同的标准化检查,为期6个月,以评估急性或晚期房室综合征的临床证据。结果:直到伤后6个月,在术后或随访期间均未观察到隔室综合征的临床证据。使用术前舒张压前30 mm Hg的P值作为公认的标准,35%的病例(n = 16; 95%的置信区间,21.5-48.5%)符合房室综合征的标准。将阈值提高到20 mm Hg的ΔP可以将假阳性率降至24%(n = 11; 95%的置信区间为11.1-34.9%)。 22%(n = 10; 95%置信区间9.5-32.5%)超过了45 mm Hg的绝对压力。结论:通过仅基于一次性隔室压力测量的当前公认的诊断标准,发现不被认为患有隔室综合征的胫骨干骨折患者,其诊断为隔室综合征的假阳性率为35%。我们的数据表明,依靠一次性的腔内压力测量可以高估腔室综合征的发生率,并引起不必要的筋膜切开术的关注。证据级别:诊断研究,II级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号