...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Teen trauma without the drama: Outcomes of adolescents treated at Ohio adult versus pediatric trauma centers
【24h】

Teen trauma without the drama: Outcomes of adolescents treated at Ohio adult versus pediatric trauma centers

机译:没有戏剧的青少年创伤:俄亥俄州成年人与小儿创伤中心接受治疗的青少年结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The optimal treatment facility for adolescent trauma patients is controversial. We sought to investigate risk-adjusted outcomes of adolescents treated at adult-only trauma centers (ATCs) versus pediatric-only trauma centers (PTCs) in a state system with legislated American College of Surgeons-verified institutions to determine ideal prehospital referral patterns. Methods: The Ohio Trauma Registry was queried for patients 15 years to 19 years with a length of stay (LOS) greater than 1 day at ATC (Level 1) or PTC (Levels 1 and 2) from 2008 to 2012. Race, sex, emergency department vital signs, Injury Severity Score (ISS), computed tomography, and ultrasound imaging were reviewed. Outcomes by mechanism of injury included ventilator days, intensive care unit LOS, hospital LOS, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using χ test, t test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Propensity score-based risk adjustment matching was used to compare groups (propensity score within 0.01, ISS within 5). Results: Of 5,793 adolescents examined, (84% blunt, 16% penetrating) 66% were treated at an ATC. In unmatched comparisons, age, ISS, vital signs, and mortality differed significantly between centers (p < 0.01). For adolescents with blunt injury, more males (71.6% vs. 66.3%, p < 0.01) and nonwhites (19.2% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.01) were seen at PTCs. For penetrating trauma, more males (88.6% vs. 50.8%, p < 0.01) and nonwhites (66.4% vs. 34.3%, p < 0.01) were admitted to ATCs. In 873 propensity-matched pairs for blunt trauma and 95 propensity-matched pairs of penetrating injuries, no differences were seen in a priori outcomes. Imaging (blunt, head computed tomography and abdominal ultrasound, p < 0.01; penetrating, abdominal ultrasound, p = 0.02) was more common at ATCs. Conclusion: Major outcome differences for injured adolescents do not exist between ATCs and PTCs, regardless of injury pattern. Imaging remains more prevalent at ATCs. In a state system with mandatory American College of Surgeons-verified centers, injury patterns need not dictate triage decisions for adolescents.
机译:背景:针对青少年创伤患者的最佳治疗手段尚有争议。我们试图在经美国外科医生学院验证的立法机构的州系统中,调查仅在成人创伤中心(ATC)与仅儿童创伤中心(PTC)进行治疗的青少年的风险调整后结局,以确定理想的院前转诊模式。方法:从2008年至2012年,对俄亥俄州创伤登记处的15岁至19岁且在ATC(1级)或PTC(1级和2级)住院时间(LOS)大于1天的患者进行查询。种族,性别,回顾了急诊科的生命体征,损伤严重程度评分(ISS),计算机断层扫描和超声成像。受伤机制的结果包括呼吸机天数,重症监护病房LOS,医院LOS和死亡率。使用χ检验,t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计分析。使用基于倾向得分的风险调整匹配对各组进行比较(倾向得分在0.01以内,ISS在5以内)。结果:在接受检查的5793名青少年中,有66%的青少年接受了ATC治疗(钝性为84%,穿透性为16%)。在无与伦比的比较中,各中心之间的年龄,ISS,生命体征和死亡率差异显着(p <0.01)。对于钝性损伤青少年,在PTC处发现更多的男性(71.6%比66.3%,p <0.01)和非白人(19.2%比15.8%,p <0.01)。对于穿透性创伤,ATC接受了更多男性(88.6%比50.8%,p <0.01)和非白人(66.4%vs. 34.3%,p <0.01)。在873个钝性创伤的倾向匹配对和95个钝性创伤的倾向匹配对中,先验结果无差异。影像学检查(钝性,头部计算机断层扫描和腹部超声检查,p <0.01;穿透性,腹部超声检查,p = 0.02)在ATC处更为常见。结论:无论受伤方式如何,ATC和PTC之间对受伤青少年的主要结局差异均不存在。成像在ATC上仍然更为普遍。在具有强制性的美国外科医生学院认证中心的州系统中,伤害模式不必决定青少年的分流决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号