...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Economic analysis of epoetin alfa in critically ill trauma patients
【24h】

Economic analysis of epoetin alfa in critically ill trauma patients

机译:重症创伤患者中依泊汀α的经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) suggest that epoetin alfa reduces mortality in critically ill trauma patients; however, epoetin alfa is also costly and associated with adverse events. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of epoetin alfa in surgical trauma patients in an intensive care unit setting. METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic model to compare adjunctive use of epoetin alfa with standard care in trauma patients from the perspective of a Canadian payer. Baseline risks of events, relative efficacy, and resource use were obtained from RCTs and observational studies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted and longer time horizons explored through Markov models. RESULTS: Epoetin alfa was associated with a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of $89,958 compared with standard care at 1 year. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that results were sensitive to plausible ranges of mortality risk, risk of thrombosis, relative risk of mortality, relative risk of thrombosis, and quality of life estimates. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves generated from probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the probability that epoetin alfa would be considered attractive ranged from 0% to 85% over a willingness-to-pay range of $25,000 to $120,000/QALY. Consideration of lifetime time horizons reduced the cost per QALY gained to $7,203, but results were sensitive to the effect of epoetin alfa on mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the cost per QALY gained with epoetin alfa use may fall into an acceptable range, there is significant uncertainty about its true cost-effectiveness. If data regarding long-term efficacy and safety are confirmed in future trials, epoetin alfa could potentially be cost-effective in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level I.
机译:背景:最近的随机对照试验(RCT)表明,依泊汀α降低了重症创伤患者的死亡率。然而,依泊汀α也很昂贵并且与不良事件有关。这项研究评估了重症监护病房中手术创伤患者中依泊汀α的成本效益。方法:我们构建了一个决策分析模型,从加拿大付款人的角度比较创伤患者的依泊汀阿尔法辅助治疗和标准护理。事件的基线风险,相对功效和资源使用均来自RCT和观察性研究。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,并通过马尔可夫模型探索了更长的时间范围。结果:与1年的标准护理相比,埃泊汀阿尔法与每质量调整生命年(QALY)的费用相关联的费用为89,958美元。单向敏感性分析表明,结果对可能的死亡风险范围,血栓形成风险,相对死亡风险,相对血栓形成风险和生活质量估计值敏感。概率敏感性分析生成的成本效益可接受性曲线表明,在愿意支付的25,000美元至120,000美元/ QALY范围内,依泊汀α被认为具有吸引力的概率为0%至85%。考虑到终生时间跨度,每获得QALY所需的费用降低至$ 7,203,但结果对埃泊汀阿尔法对死亡率的影响敏感。结论:尽管使用依泊汀阿法获得的每QALY的成本可能落在可接受的范围内,但其真正的成本效益仍存在很大不确定性。如果在未来的试验中证实了有关长期疗效和安全性的数据,那么依泊汀α在该人群中可能具有成本效益。证据级别:经济分析,I级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号