首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Effect of seat belt pretensioners on human abdomen and thorax: Biomechanical response and risk of injuries.
【24h】

Effect of seat belt pretensioners on human abdomen and thorax: Biomechanical response and risk of injuries.

机译:安全带预紧器对人体腹部和胸部的影响:生物力学反应和受伤风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

: A better coupling of the occupant to the car seat in the early phase of a frontal or far side impacts using pretensioner systems may reduce the likelihood of the submarining effect or increases the likelihood of seat belt engaging the shoulder, respectively. However, the high belt forces may also increase the risk of upper body injuries to the vehicle occupant (especially in abdominal region). It was hypothesized that human body characteristics, such as body mass index (BMI) influence the biomechanical response and injury outcome to the abdominal regions during static pretensioning deployment tests.: Four postmortem human specimens (PMHS), in a BMI range from 15.6 to 31.2, were positioned in production seats in a normal passenger position and were restrained using a standard three-point belt system. The pretension forces in the belts were generated at two points (retractor and right anchorage) or at all three locations (retractor, left anchorage, and right anchorage). An optical motion capture system and acceleration cubes mounted to the lumbar spine were used to measure the abdomen deformation during testing.: The normalized deflections of the thorax recorded at the level of fourth rib were under 10% (noninjury level). Two different patterns were observed in the time histories of abdominal penetration rate in the four PMHSs associated with lower and higher BMI. Abdominal injuries (spleen lacerations) were observed only in the two PMHS with highest BMI.: Based on data from this study and similar data from the literature, belt velocity and FmaxCmax were shown to be the best injury predictors for injury risk analysis for Abbreviated Injury Scale 2+ and for Abbreviated Injury Scale 3+ injuries, respectively.
机译::使用预紧器系统,在正面或远侧碰撞的早期阶段,将乘员与汽车座椅更好地耦合,可以分别降低潜艇作用的可能性或增加安全带与肩膀接合的可能性。但是,较高的皮带力也可能增加乘员上身受伤的风险(尤其是在腹部区域)。假设人体特征(例如体重指数(BMI))会影响静态预拉伸部署测试期间对腹部区域的生物力学响应和损伤结果。:四个死后人体样本(PMHS),BMI范围为15.6至31.2 ,以正常的乘客位置放置在生产座椅上,并使用标准的三点式安全带系统进行约束。皮带中的预紧力是在两个点(牵开器和右锚定点)或在所有三个位置(牵开器,左锚定和右锚定点)产生的。在测试过程中,使用光学运动捕捉系统和安装在腰椎上的加速立方体来测量腹部的变形。:在第四肋骨处记录的正常胸廓挠度低于10%(无损伤水平)。在与较低和较高BMI相关的四个PMHS中,腹部渗透率的时间历史观察到两种不同的模式。仅在两个BMI最高的PMHS中观察到腹部损伤(脾裂伤):根据本研究的数据和文献中的相似数据,皮带速度和FmaxCmax被证明是进行简短伤害的伤害风险分析的最佳伤害预测因子2+级和3+级轻伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号