...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations.
【24h】

Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations.

机译:硅酮披露程序对复合水泥对陶瓷修复体的剪切粘结强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Statement of problem. There is no evidence-based information on how ceramic restorations with an adhesive bond between restoration material and composite cement may be influenced by a silicone disclosing agent. Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements in the luting of industrial sintered and laboratory sintered ceramic restorations. Material and methods. Thirty standardized (15 x 10 x 9 mm) prefabricated ceramic specimens (Groups 1, 3, 5) and 30 standardized (15 x10 x 9 mm) conventionally sintered ceramic specimens (Groups 2, 4, 6) were roughened with sandpaper (800-grit). Each group contained 10 specimens. Groups 3 and 4 were conditioned with hydrofluoric acid and primed with silane solution after the use of a silicone disclosing procedure. Groups 1 and 2 served as the control groups, where no silicone disclosing procedure was performed. Groups 5 and 6 were insulated with glycerine before the silicone disclosing procedure. A glass tube (4.5 mm in diameter) was used to apply a cylinder of dual-polymerized composite cement to the conditioned surfaces. All specimens were submitted to 5000 thermocycles (5 degrees to 55 degrees C) to simulate the in vivo situation. The specimens were subjected to a shear-pull test at a constant crosshead speed of 5 mm/min with a universal testing machine. The comparative shear bond strengths were analyzed by use of Duncan's test (alpha=0.05). Results. Shear bond strength values for Groups 1 (9.86 +/- 4.97 MPa) and 2 (9.56 +/- 4.47 Mpa) were obtained with no significant differences. Lower but significantly undifferent values were obtained for Groups 3 (7.49 +/- 4.67 MPa) and 4 (7.62 +/- 3.49 MPa) after the use of a silicone disclosing procedure. In Groups 5 (8.21 +/- 4.75 MPa) and 6 (8.22 +/- 3.59 MPa), including insulation with glycerine before the silicone disclosing procedure, no significant differences were obtained. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study,the use of silicone disclosing procedures before conditioning the ceramic surface did not lead to a significant reduction of the shear bond strength between ceramic and composite cement. The ceramic materials used (industrial-sintered versus laboratory-sintered ceramic) had no significant influence on adhesion.
机译:问题陈述。没有证据表明有机硅显露剂如何影响在修复材料和复合水泥之间具有粘结力的陶瓷修复体。目的。这项研究的目的是确定在工业烧结和实验室烧结的陶瓷修复体中,有机硅披露程序对复合水泥的剪切粘结强度的影响。材料与方法。用砂纸将800个标准化(15 x 10 x 9 mm)预制陶瓷样品(1、3、5组)和30个标准化(15 x10 x 9 mm)常规烧结陶瓷样品(2、4、6组)进行打磨(800-砂砾)。每组包含10个标本。在使用有机硅披露程序后,将第3组和第4组用氢氟酸处理并用硅烷溶液涂底漆。第1组和第2组为对照组,其中未进行有机硅披露程序。在有机硅公开程序之前,将第5组和第6组用甘油绝缘。使用玻璃管(直径为4.5毫米)将一筒双聚合复合水泥施加到已调理的表面上。所有标本都经过5000个热循环(5到55摄氏度)以模拟体内情况。用万能试验机以5mm / min的恒定十字头速度对样品进行剪切拉试验。通过使用邓肯检验(α= 0.05)来分析比较剪切粘结强度。结果。获得第1组(9.86 +/- 4.97 MPa)和第2组(9.56 +/- 4.47 Mpa)的剪切粘结强度值,无显着差异。使用硅酮披露程序后,第3组(7.49 +/- 4.67 MPa)和第4组(7.62 +/- 3.49 MPa)获得了较低但明显不同的值。在第5组(8.21 +/- 4.75 MPa)和第6组(8.22 +/- 3.59 MPa)中,包括在硅酮披露程序之前用甘油进行绝缘处理,没有发现显着差异。结论。在本研究的范围内,在调理陶瓷表面之前使用有机硅披露程序并未导致陶瓷与复合水泥之间的剪切粘结强度显着降低。所用的陶瓷材料(工业烧结和实验室烧结的陶瓷)对附着力没有显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号