首页> 外文期刊>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research >Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus.
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus.

机译:超声宫腔造影,子宫输卵管造影术和宫腔镜诊断对弓形,分隔和双角形子宫的诊断准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography (SHG), hysterosalpingography (HSG) and diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH) in uterine anomaly detection and to assess the role of these various modalities in the differential diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uteri. METHODS: Eighty-three women, with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions or infertility and initial diagnosis of uterine anomaly were included in the study. Diagnostic work-up comprised of SHG, HSG and DH. To assess the accuracy of these methods all the patients underwent hysterolaparoscopy to establish the final diagnosis. The correlation between the results of each method was evaluated and diagnostic accuracy of each method was assessed in the whole group of women as well as in subgroups of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uteri using receiver operator curve (ROC) method by estimating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: In the overall diagnosis of uterine anomalies, SHG with accuracy of 95.2% and correlation index of 0.873 (P < 0.001) proved to be a significantly better tool compared to DH (SHG(AUC) = 0.924 versus DH(AUC) = 0.761 P = 0.008), while no significant differences were observed between SHG versus HSG and DH versus HSG. SHG showed significantly higher accuracy (100.0%) compared to DH (80.7%) and HSG (80.7%) in differentiation of a septate (SHG(AUC) = 1.000 versus DH(AUC) = 0.816 P < 0.001 and SHG(AUC) = 1.000 versus HSG(ACC) = 0.818; P < 0.001) and bicornuate uterus (SGH(AUC) = 1.000 versus DH(ACC) = 0.707; P < 0.001 and SHG(ACC) = 1.000 versus HSG(AUC) = 0.790; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: SHG is a noninvasive, cost-effective method available in an outpatient setting that is highly accurate in identifying uterine anomalies, in particular septate and bicornuate uterus.
机译:目的:评估超声宫腔造影(SHG),子宫输卵管造影(HSG)和宫腔镜诊断(DH)在子宫异常检测中的诊断准确性,并评估这些不同方式在弓形,分隔和双角形子宫鉴别诊断中的作用。方法:83名具有反复自然流产或不育病史并初步诊断为子宫异常的妇女被纳入研究。诊断检查包括SHG,HSG和DH。为了评估这些方法的准确性,所有患者均接受了宫腔镜检查以建立最终诊断。使用接收器操作者曲线(ROC)方法,通过估计子宫下段面积,评估整个方法组妇女以及弓形,分隔和双角形子宫亚组中每种方法的结果之间的相关性,并评估每种方法的诊断准确性。曲线(AUC)。结果:在子宫异常的整体诊断中,SHG的准确度为95.2%,相关指数为0.873(P <0.001),与DH(SHG(AUC)= 0.924 vs DH(AUC)= 0.761)相比,是一种更好的工具。 P = 0.008),而SHG与HSG和DH与HSG之间未观察到显着差异。与DH(80.7%)和HSG(80.7%)相比,SHG在分离物分化方面显示出显着更高的准确性(100.0%)(SHG(AUC)= 1.000 vs DH(AUC)= 0.816 P <0.001和SHG(AUC)= 1.000对HSG(ACC)= 0.818; P <0.001)和双角子宫(SGH(AUC)= 1.000对DH(ACC)= 0.707; P <0.001和SHG(ACC)= 1.000对HSG(AUC)= 0.790; P = 0.002)。结论:SHG是一种非侵入性,具有成本效益的方法,可在门诊患者中使用,可以高度准确地识别子宫异常,尤其是分隔和双角子宫。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号