首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >The impact of continuing professional development versus traditional continuing pharmacy education on pharmacy practice.
【24h】

The impact of continuing professional development versus traditional continuing pharmacy education on pharmacy practice.

机译:持续专业发展与传统持续药学教育对药学实践的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine states that the new vision for continuing education (CE) for health-care professionals will be based on continuing professional development (CPD); however, information on the utility of CPD is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of CPD, compared with that of traditional continuing pharmacy education (CPE), on perceptions of factors related to pharmacy practice. METHODS: This 10-month, nonblinded, randomized controlled study recruited licensed pharmacists employed at a health maintenance organization (HMO). After completing a basic CPD course, participants were randomized to the intervention or control group. The control group was instructed to continue with traditional CPE. The intervention group participants completed 3 CPD workshops and were instructed to utilize the CPD approach for their learning needs. At baseline and follow-up, all participants completed a study questionnaire on perceptions of their pharmacy practices. The outcome measures were comparisons on follow-up and changes from baseline to follow-up in responses to the study questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred pharmacists were enrolled. The intervention (n = 44, 7 lost to follow-up) and control (n = 47, 2 lost to follow-up) groups were similar at baseline. At follow-up, a higher percentage of intervention participants reported that they had better interactions with other health-care providers (always/frequently 32% vs 6%, respectively) and initiated practice/work changes (always/frequently 21% vs 0%, respectively) (both p < 0.01) as a result of their education activities. Compared with control participants at follow-up, intervention participants reported that their education activities improved patient care changes (46% vs 23%), professional knowledge (34% vs 6%), skills (48% vs 17%), and attitudes/values (43% to 11%) (all p < 0.05). However, intervention participants reported more often that time was a barrier to completing education activities (75% vs 32%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists who participated in CPD reported more often that their perceptions of various aspects of their pharmacy practice improved as a result of their education activities compared with pharmacists who participated in traditional CPE.
机译:背景:医学研究所指出,针对卫生保健专业人员的继续教育(CE)的新愿景将基于持续专业发展(CPD);但是,缺乏有关CPD实用性的信息。目的:与传统的继续药学教育(CPE)相比,评估CPD对与药学实践相关的因素的认知效果。方法:这项为期10个月的非盲,随机对照研究招募了一家在健康维持组织(HMO)任职的执业药师。完成基本的CPD课程后,将参与者随机分为干预组或对照组。指示对照组继续进行传统的CPE。干预小组的参与者完成了3次CPD讲习班,并被指示使用CPD方法满足他们的学习需求。在基线和随访时,所有参与者均完成了关于其药房实践认知的研究调查表。结果量度是对随访的比较,以及对研究问卷的响应从基线到随访的变化。结果:招募了一百名药剂师。干预组(n = 44,随访失败7例)和对照组(n = 47,随访失败2例)在基线时相似。随访时,较高比例的干预参与者表示他们与其他卫生保健提供者的互动更好(始终/经常分别为32%和6%),并且开始了实践/工作变更(始终/经常为21%vs 0%) (分别为p <0.01)作为其教育活动的结果。与随访中的对照参与者相比,干预参与者报告说,他们的教育活动改善了患者的护理变化(46%比23%),专业知识(34%比6%),技能(48%比17%)和态度/值(43%至11%)(所有p <0.05)。但是,干预参与者更经常地报告说,时间是完成教育活动的障碍(75%比32%,p <0.001)。结论:参加CPD的药剂师报告更多的是,与参加传统CPE的药剂师相比,由于他们的教育活动,他们对自己药剂学实践各个方面的认识得到了改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号