首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise.
【24h】

The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise.

机译:集中化现象和避免恐惧的信念是急性下腰痛的预后因素:一项涉及分类为特定运动的患者的初步调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with acute low back pain (LBP). OBJECTIVES: To determine if the centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs predict measurement of pain and disability 6 months after entering the study. BACKGROUND: The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance are predictive of future pain and disability. However, previous prognostic studies have not routinely included both measures in homogenous subgroups of patients with acute LBP. METHODS AND MEASURES: Patients completed self-report questionnaires and were evaluated and treated with treatment-based classification guidelines. Only the patients classified for specific exercise were included in this analysis (n = 28). Measures of disability and pain intensity were reassessed at 6 months by mail. Separate hierarchical regression models predicted measures of disability and pain intensity with the centralization phenomenon, fear-avoidance beliefs, and prespecified covariates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in duration of symptoms, fear-avoidance beliefs, and history of LBP based on the centralization phenomenon (P > .05). Patients reporting the centralization phenomenon were significantly more likely to have leg pain (P < .01). A regression model including initial disability, the centralization phenomenon, and fear-avoidance beliefs about work significantly predicted 6-month disability, explaining 49% of the total variance (P < .001). A regression model that included initial pain intensity and the centralization phenomenon significantly predicted 6-month pain intensity, explaining 29% of the total variance (P < .016). These factors also appeared to be clinically meaningful predictors of outcome, but lacked precision for immediate use in clinical settings. The following covariates were not included in the final regression models: presence of leg pain, history of LBP, and duration of LBP. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline elevation in fear-avoidance beliefs about work and lack of centralization phenomenon predicted higher disability. Baseline lack of centralization phenomenon predicted higher pain intensity. These results can only be generalized to patients with acute LBP classified for specific exercise. It will be necessary to independently validate these prediction models before they can be implemented in clinical settings.
机译:研究设计:对急性下腰痛(LBP)患者的前瞻性队列的二级分析。目的:确定集中化现象和避免恐惧的信念是否可以预测进入研究后6个月的疼痛和残疾程度。背景:集中化现象和避免恐惧可预示未来的痛苦和残疾。然而,先前的预后研究并未常规将两种方法用于急性LBP患者的同质亚组。方法和措施:患者完成自我报告调查表,并根据基于治疗的分类指南进行评估和治疗。该分析仅包括分类为特定运动的患者(n = 28)。邮寄后6个月重新评估了残疾程度和疼痛程度。单独的分层回归模型通过集中化现象,避免恐惧的信念和预先指定的协变量来预测对残疾和疼痛强度的度量。结果:基于集中化现象,症状持续时间,避免恐惧的信念和LBP病史没有显着差异(P> .05)。报告集中化现象的患者出现腿痛的可能性更高(P <.01)。包括初始残疾,集中化现象和对工作的恐惧回避信念在内的回归模型可以显着预测6个月的残疾,占总变异的49%(P <.001)。包含初始疼痛强度和集中现象的回归模型可以显着预测6个月的疼痛强度,解释了总差异的29%(P <.016)。这些因素似乎也是临床上有意义的预后指标,但缺乏在临床环境中立即使用的精确度。最终的回归模型中未包括以下协变量:腿痛的存在,LBP的病史和LBP的持续时间。结论:关于工作的恐惧回避信念和缺乏集中化现象的基线升高预示着更高的残疾。基线缺乏集中化现象预示着更高的疼痛强度。这些结果只能推广到针对特定运动分类的急性LBP患者。在临床环境中实施这些预测模型之前,有必要独立验证它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号