...
首页> 外文期刊>The American heart journal >A cluster randomized trial of objective risk assessment versus standard care for acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the Australian GRACE Risk score Intervention Study (AGRIS)
【24h】

A cluster randomized trial of objective risk assessment versus standard care for acute coronary syndromes: Rationale and design of the Australian GRACE Risk score Intervention Study (AGRIS)

机译:一项针对急性冠脉综合征的客观风险评估与标准治疗的随机分组试验:澳大利亚GRACE风险评分干预研究(AGRIS)的原理和设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Assessing risk and weighing the potential benefits from evidence-based therapies are essential in the clinical decision making process of optimizing care and outcomes for patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Such practices are advocated in international clinical guidelines of ACS care. While the GRACE risk score (GRS) is a guideline advocated, well-validated risk stratification tool, its utility in improving care and outcomes remains unproven, and its application has been limited in routine clinical practice.
机译:背景技术评估风险并权衡循证疗法的潜在益处对于优化急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的护理和结局的临床决策过程至关重要。 ACS护理的国际临床指南中提倡此类做法。尽管GRACE风险评分(GRS)是一个指南,是经过充分验证的风险分层工具,但其在改善护理和结局方面的效用仍未得到证实,其应用在常规临床实践中也受到限制。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号