首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >Effect of medial arch support on displacement of the myotendinous junction of the gastrocnemius during standing wall stretching.
【24h】

Effect of medial arch support on displacement of the myotendinous junction of the gastrocnemius during standing wall stretching.

机译:站立足弓拉伸过程中内侧足弓支撑对腓肠肌肌腱交界处位移的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of standing wall stretching with and without medial arch support (WMAS versus WOMAS) on the displacement of the myotendinous junction (DMTJ) of the medial gastrocnemius, rearfoot angle, and navicular height in subjects with neutral foot alignment and pes planus. BACKGROUND: Standing wall stretching is often prescribed to increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion for sports fitness and rehabilitation. However, the effect of standing wall stretching WMAS on DMTJ is unknown. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with neutral foot alignment and 15 subjects with pes planus performed standing wall stretching under WMAS and WOMAS conditions. Measurements of DMTJ and rearfoot position were performed using ultrasonography and video imaging. Navicular height was measured using a ruler. Dependent variables were examined with a 2-way mixed-design analysis of variance. The 2 factors were foot type (neutral foot versus pes planus) and stretching condition (WMAS versus WOMAS). RESULTS: There were significant interactions of medial arch support by foot type for DMTJ, rearfoot angle, and navicular drop (P<.001). A post hoc paired t test showed that standing wall stretching in the WMAS condition significantly increased the DMTJ, compared to stretching in the WOMAS condition, in subjects with neutral foot (mean +/- SD, 9.6 +/- 1.6 versus 10.5 +/- 1.6 mm; difference, 0.9 mm; 99% CI: 0.4-1.4 mm) and in those with pes planus (10.0 +/- 1.8 versus 12.7 +/- 2.0 mm; difference, 2.7 mm; 99% CI: 1.9-3.5 mm) (P<.001). When comparing WOMAS and WMAS, the difference in DMTJ (1.8 mm; 99% CI: 0.9-2.7 mm) was significantly greater in subjects with pes planus than in those with neutral foot (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Standing wall stretching with medial arch support maintained subtalar joint neutral position and increased the length of the gastrocnemius in subjects with pes planus. When prescribing standing wall stretching, clinicians need to emphasize the use of medial arch support to effectively stretch the gastrocnemius in subjects with pes planus.
机译:研究设计:受控实验室研究。目的:研究在有中性足部对齐和足底矫正的受试者中,有无内侧足弓支撑(WMAS与WOMAS)的站立壁拉伸对内侧腓肠肌肌腱接头(DMTJ)的位移,后足角度和航海高度的影响扁平。背景:经常规定站立的墙壁拉伸,以增加踝关节的背屈运动范围,以进行运动健身和康复。但是,站立式墙面拉伸WMAS对DMTJ的影响尚不清楚。方法:在WMAS和WOMAS条件下,进行15例中性足对齐的受试者和15例扁平足的受试者进行站立壁拉伸。 DMTJ和后脚位置的测量使用超声检查和视频成像进行。使用尺子测量鼻高。通过方差的2-way混合设计分析检查了因变量。这两个因素是脚的类型(中性脚vs阴囊)和伸展状况(WMAS vs WOMAS)。结果:DMTJ,后足角度和舟状垂体的足部类型与足弓内侧支撑之间存在显着相互作用(P <.001)。事后配对t检验表明,在中性足患者中,在WMAS条件下站立的壁拉伸与在WOMAS条件下进行的拉伸相比,显着增加了DMTJ(平均+/- SD,9.6 +/- 1.6与10.5 +/- 1.6毫米;差异0.9毫米; 99%CI:0.4-1.4毫米)和扁平疱疹患者(10.0 +/- 1.8对12.7 +/- 2.0毫米;差异2.7毫米; 99%CI:1.9-3.5毫米)(P <.001)。当比较WOMAS和WMAS时,扁平足受试者的DMTJ(1.8 mm; 99%CI:0.9-2.7 mm)的差异显着大于中性足受试者(P <.001)。结论:在内侧足弓支撑下站立的壁伸展可以保持距下关节中立位置,并增加了扁平足患者的腓肠肌长度。在规定伸展立壁时,临床医生需要强调使用内侧足弓支撑来有效伸展扁平足患者的腓肠肌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号