首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.
【24h】

Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.

机译:超重患者18F-FDG PET / CT成像方案的比较:优化扫描时间与给药剂量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The quality of (18)F-FDG PET/CT images of overweight patients is often degraded. We evaluated the effect of optimizing injected dose or acquisition time on the quality of images of overweight patients using lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET/CT with high-performance detector electronics. METHODS: We initially retrospectively measured radioactivity concentrations and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in the liver relative to body weight for 80 patients who had undergone (18)F-FDG PET/CT according to our standard protocol (injected dose, 3.7 MBq/kg; acquisition time, 2 min/bed position). The patients were grouped (n = 20 per group) according to baseline body weight as G1 (or=85 kg). We compared the SNRs of G1 with those of G2, G3, and G4 and calculated the ratio squared as a factor to correct the acquisition parameters for overweight patients. We then prospectively enrolled 120 patients according to the same body weight criteria. We multiplied the correction factors to optimize injected doses or acquisition times and defined dose-adjusted groups (n = 20 per group) and time-adjusted groups (n = 20 per group). G2 dose was defined as 5.59 +/- 0.19 MBq/kg, G3 dose as 7.29 +/- 0.33 MBq/kg, and G4 dose as 8.88 +/- 0.43 MBq/kg. G2 time was defined as 3 min/bed position, G3 time as 4 min/bed position, and G4 time as 5 min/bed position. RESULTS: Although liver activities did not significantly differ among G1 through G4 irrespective of patient weight, SNR progressively decreased as patient weight increased. The liver activities of G2 dose, G3 dose, and G4 dose were, respectively, 1.4-, 1.9-, and 2.5-fold higher than those of the baseline counterparts. Nevertheless, the increased liver activities of G2 dose, G3 dose, and G4 dose did not significantly affect SNR, compared with the baseline groups. In contrast, the SNR of G4 time was significantly higher than that of G4. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the quality of images acquired from heavier patients can be maintained only by scanning for longer periods. Increasing the dose per kilogram of body weight did not improve the quality of lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET/CT images.
机译:超重患者的(18)F-FDG PET / CT图像质量通常会下降。我们通过使用高性能检测电子设备的原硅酸PET PET / CT评估了优化注射剂量或采集时间对超重患者图像质量的影响。方法:我们最初根据我们的标准方案(注射剂量为3.7,回顾性测量了80例接受了(18)F-FDG PET / CT的患者的肝脏中的放射性浓度和信噪比(SNR)。 MBq / kg;采集时间,每分钟2分钟)。根据基线体重将患者分组(每组n = 20),分别为G1(<或= 59 kg),G2(60-69 kg),G3(70-84 kg)和G4(>或= 85 kg) )。我们将G1的SNR与G2,G3和G4的SNR进行了比较,并计算了平方比作为校正超重患者采集参数的因素。然后,我们根据相同的体重标准预期招募了120名患者。我们将校正因子乘以优化注射剂量或采集时间,并定义了剂量调整组(每组n = 20)和时间调整组(每组n = 20)。 G2剂量定义为5.59 +/- 0.19 MBq / kg,G3剂量定义为7.29 +/- 0.33 MBq / kg,G4剂量定义为8.88 +/- 0.43 MBq / kg。 G2时间定义为3分钟/床位,G3时间定义为4分钟/床位,G4时间定义为5分钟/床位。结果:尽管G1至G4的肝活动与患者体重无关,但无明显差异,但SNR随着患者体重的增加而逐渐降低。 G2剂量,G3剂量和G4剂量的肝脏活性分别比基线水平高1.4倍,1.9倍和2.5倍。尽管如此,与基线组相比,G2剂量,G3剂量和G4剂量增加的肝活动并未显着影响SNR。相反,G4时间的SNR显着高于G4。结论:我们的发现表明,只有通过扫描更长的时间,才能维持从较重患者获得的图像质量。增加每公斤体重的剂量并不能提高原硅酸PET PET / CT图像的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号