首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Prospective Comparison of Tc-99m-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined F-18-NaF and F-18-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer
【24h】

Prospective Comparison of Tc-99m-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined F-18-NaF and F-18-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer

机译:Tc-99m-MDP闪烁显像,F-18-NaF和F-18-FDG PET / CT结合以及全身MRI对乳腺癌和前列腺癌的前瞻性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We prospectively evaluated the use of combined F-18-NaF/(18)FFDG PET/CT in patients with breast and prostate cancer and compared the results with those for Tc-99m-MDP bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI. Methods: Thirty patients (15 women with breast cancer and 15 men with prostate cancer) referred for standard-of-care bone scintigraphy were prospectively enrolled in this study. F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI were performed after bone scintigraphy. The whole-body MRI protocol consisted of both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sequences. Lesions detected with each test were tabulated, and the results were compared. Results: For extraskeletal lesions, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI had no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (92.9% vs. 92.9%, P = 1.00), positive predictive value (81.3% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.68), or accuracy (76.5% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.56). However, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (96.2% vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.01) and bone scintigraphy (96.2% vs. 64.6%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 65.9%, P < 0.001) for the detection of skeletal lesions. Overall, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (95.7% vs. 83.3%, P < 0.002, 87.6% vs. 76.0%, P < 0.02) but not statistically significantly so when compared with a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy (95.7% vs. 91.6%, P 5 0.17, 87.6% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.53). F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed no significant difference from a combination of F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI. No statistically significant differences in positive predictive value were noted among the 3 examinations. Conclusion: F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT is superior to whole-body MRI and Tc-99m-MDP scintigraphy for evaluation of skeletal disease extent. Further, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI detected extraskeletal disease that may change the management of these patients. F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT provides diagnostic ability similar to that of a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast and prostate cancer. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these preliminary findings, ideally using the newly introduced simultaneous PET/MRI scanners.
机译:我们对乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者中F-18-NaF /(18)FFDG PET / CT的结合使用进行了前瞻性评估,并将结果与​​Tc-99m-MDP骨闪烁显像和全身MRI进行了比较。方法:前瞻性纳入了接受标准骨闪烁显像检查的30例患者(15例乳腺癌女性和15例前列腺癌男性)。骨闪烁显像后进行F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT和全身MRI。全身MRI方案由未增强序列和对比增强序列组成。将每个测试中检测到的病变列表化,并比较结果。结果:对于骨骼外病变,F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT和全身MRI在敏感性(92.9%对92.9%,P = 1.00),阳性预测值(81.3)方面无统计学意义的差异%vs. 86.7%,P = 0.68)或准确性(76.5%vs. 82.4%,P = 0.56)。但是,F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT的敏感性和准确性明显高于全身MRI(96.2%比81.4%,P <0.001,89.8%比74.7%,P = 0.01)和骨骼闪烁显像(96.2%vs. 64.6%,P <0.001,89.8%vs. 65.9%,P <0.001)以检测骨骼病变。总体而言,F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT的敏感性和准确性高于全身MRI(95.7%vs.83.3%,P <0.002,87.6%vs. 76.0%,P <0.02),但与全身MRI和骨闪烁显像相结合时没有统计学显着性(95.7%vs. 91.6%,P 5 0.17、87.6%vs. 83.0%,P = 0.53)。 F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT与F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT和全身MRI的结合无明显差异。在3项检查之间,未发现阳性预测值的统计学差异。结论:F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT在评估骨骼疾病程度方面优于全身MRI和Tc-99m-MDP闪烁显像。此外,F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT和全身MRI检测到可能改变这些患者管理的骨骼外疾病。 F-18-NaF / F-18-FDG PET / CT对乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者的诊断能力类似于全身MRI和骨闪烁显像的组合。需要更大的队列来确认这些初步发现,最好使用新近推出的同步PET / MRI扫描仪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号