首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of laryngology and otology. >Ear protection as a treatment for disruptive snoring: do ear plugs really work?
【24h】

Ear protection as a treatment for disruptive snoring: do ear plugs really work?

机译:耳部防护可打呼:耳塞真的有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the absence of surgical treatments with demonstrable long-term efficacy, conservative treatments for snoring remain appropriate. Only limited evidence evaluating the use of ear protection by partners has been published. METHODS: Eligible couples were invited to participate in a two-month trial, with each partner using custom-moulded ear plugs. Five questionnaires were completed by patients and their partners, at baseline and after two months: the snoring outcomes survey (SOS) or the spouse/bed partners survey (SBPS), the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), the Nottingham health profile (NHP) and the Golombok-Rust inventory of marital status (GRIMS). RESULTS: After two months, there was a significant improvement in the SOS score for patients (p = 0.005), the SBPS score for partners (p = 0.001) and the ESS for partners (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: For selected couples, ear plugs represent an effective short-term treatment for some of the social effects of disruptive snoring, as determined by the SOS, SBPS and ESS questionnaires.
机译:背景:在缺乏可证明长期疗效的手术治疗的情况下,打conservative的保守治疗仍然是合适的。只有有限的证据评估伴侣使用耳罩的情况。方法:邀请符合条件的夫妇参加为期两个月的试验,每个伴侣都使用定制的耳塞。患者及其伴侣在基线和两个月后完成了五份问卷:打nor结果调查(SOS)或配偶/床伴侣调查(SBPS),Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS),总体健康调查表12( GHQ-12),诺丁汉健康状况(NHP)和戈兰博克-Rust婚姻状况清单(GRIMS)。结果:两个月后,患者的SOS评分(p = 0.005),伴侣的SBPS评分(p = 0.001)和伴侣的ESS(p = 0.004)有显着改善。结论对于SOS,SBPS和ESS问卷所确定的,对于选定的夫妻,耳塞代表了有效的短期治疗打treatment打ive的社会影响的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号