首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of laryngology and otology. >Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin for the treatment of acute, bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin for the treatment of acute, bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults.

机译:莫西沙星和曲伐沙星治疗成人急性细菌性上颌窦炎的疗效和安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, out-patients with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive either a seven-day, once daily (o.d.) oral regimen of moxifloxacin (400 mg) or a 10-day o.d. oral regimen of trovafloxacin (200 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, moxifloxacin treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to trovafloxacin (96.9 per cent vs 92.1 per cent -95 per cent CI = 0.6 per cent; 8.9 per cent) at the seven to 10 days post-therapy assessment. At follow-up, the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 94.9 per cent and that for the trovafloxacin group was 97.6 per cent (95 per cent CI = -4.9 per cent; 1.3 per cent). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The bacteriological success rate at the post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 94.4 per cent and 90.1 per cent in the moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin groups respectively (95 per cent CI = -3.0 per cent; 11.9 per cent). Only three of the 103 baseline isolated pathogens still persisted in the moxifloxacin group, whereas there were 10 of the 121 isolates that failed to respond in the trovafloxacin treatment group. At least one drug-related event was reported by 16.9 per cent of the moxifloxacin-treated patients and by 22.3 per cent of those who received trovafloxacin. CNS events such as dizziness and vertigo were reported more than five times more often in patients receiving trovafloxacin than in the moxifloxacin group. Trovafloxacin recipients were also more than twice as likely to discontinue treatment due to adverse events than moxifloxacin-treated patients. Overall, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as trovafloxacin and better tolerated.
机译:在这项多中心,多国,比较,双盲临床试验中,将具有急性鼻窦炎症状和影像学表现的门诊患者随机分配接受莫西沙星(400毫克)每天7天,每日一次的口服方案或odd为10天曲伐沙星口服方案(200 mg)。在452名被认为具有临床疗效的患者中,莫西沙星治疗在治疗后7至10天在统计学上等效于曲伐沙星(96.9%vs 92.1%-95%CI = 0.6%; 8.9%)评定。随访时,莫西沙星组的成功率为94.9%,而托伐沙星组的成功率为97.6%(95%CI = -4.9%; 1.3%)。主要的致病菌是肺炎链球菌,流感嗜血杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,其次是肠杆菌科和卡他莫拉菌。两个治疗组在治疗后评估中的细菌学成功率相似:莫西沙星和曲伐沙星组分别为94.4%和90.1%(95%CI = -3.0%; 11.9%)。在莫西沙星组的103种基线分离的病原体中,只有3种仍然存在,而在曲伐沙星治疗组的121种分离株中,有10种没有反应。据报道,在接受莫西沙星治疗的患者中,至少有16.9%与接受曲伐沙星治疗的患者发生了22.3%的药物相关事件。接受曲伐沙星治疗的中枢神经系统事件如头晕和眩晕的发生率是莫西沙星组的五倍。与不良反应相比,接受托伐沙星治疗的患者因不良事件而中止治疗的可能性也比接受莫西沙星治疗的患者高两倍。总体而言,莫西沙星在临床和细菌学上至少与曲伐沙星一样有效,并且耐受性更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号