首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD >Performance evaluation of two methods using commercially available reagents for PCR-based detection of FMR1 mutation
【24h】

Performance evaluation of two methods using commercially available reagents for PCR-based detection of FMR1 mutation

机译:使用市售试剂进行基于PCR的FMR1突变检测的两种方法的性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The current workflow for clinical Fragile X testing is time consuming and labor intensive. Recently developed PCR-based methods simplify workflow, amplify full mutation alleles, and improve sensitivity for detecting low-level mosaicism. We evaluated the performance characteristics and workflow of two methods using commercially available reagents for determining FMR1 mutation status. We also tested each method's ability to detect mosaicism (range, 100% to 1% for males; 50% to 1% for females). One method used reagents from Asuragen (AmplideX FMR1 PCR, research use only). The second method used analyte specific reagents from Abbott Molecular, including FMR1 Primer 1 (for repeat sizing) and FMR1 Primer 2 (for screening of expanded alleles). Each reaction was evaluated for accuracy, precision, correlation with previous results, and workflow. Both methods performed equally well in accuracy and precision studies using NIST standards and previously characterized Coriell samples. Both methods showed 100% concordance with results from a previous consensus study and for previously analyzed patient samples. The Asuragen reagents were able to detect full mutation mosaicism down to 5% and premutation mosaicism to 1%. The Abbott Molecular Primer 2 reagents were able to detect both full mutation and premutation mosaicism down to 25%. Both PCR-based methods for the determination of FMR1 mutation status performed well, with expected results in their final diagnoses, and differed significantly only in their workflow.
机译:目前用于临床Fragile X测试的工作流程既耗时又费力。最近开发的基于PCR的方法简化了工作流程,扩增了完整的突变等位基因,并提高了检测低水平嵌合体的灵敏度。我们使用市售试剂确定FMR1突变状态,评估了两种方法的性能特征和工作流程。我们还测试了每种方法检测镶嵌的能力(男性为100%到1%;女性为50%到1%)。一种方法是使用Asuragen的试剂(AmplideX FMR1 PCR,仅供研究使用)。第二种方法使用了来自Abbott Molecular的分析物特异性试剂,包括FMR1引物1(用于重复上浆)和FMR1引物2(用于扩增扩展的等位基因)。评估每个反应的准确性,精密度,与先前结果的相关性以及工作流程。使用NIST标准和先前表征的Coriell样品,两种方法在准确性和精密度研究中均表现出色。两种方法均显示与先前的共识研究结果和先前分析的患者样品的结果100%一致。 Asuragen试剂能够检测到低至5%的全突变镶嵌和前突变至1%的镶嵌。 Abbott Molecular Primer 2试剂能够检测到25%的完全突变和突变前镶嵌。两种基于PCR的FMR1突变状态测定方法均表现良好,在最终诊断中具有预期结果,并且仅在工作流程上有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号