首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Etiology of Failures and Clinical Results
【24h】

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Etiology of Failures and Clinical Results

机译:修订前交叉韧带重建失败的病因和临床结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A retrospective study was performed to determine the etiology of failed primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and evaluate the clinical results of revision ACL surgery. From January 1989 to January 1996, 90 patients with failed ACL reconstructions underwent revision ACL surgery. The etiology of failed ACL reconstruction included 47 surgical technical errors, 22 traumatic reinjuries, 7 lack of graft incorporation, 3 loss of motion, 3 related to synthetic grafts, and 8 alignment or combined liga-mentous instability patterns not addressed. Of 52 revision ACL patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, 43 responded to a questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive physical examination. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament evaluation revealed 63% good/excellent results. Objective laxity test revealed 77% of all patients had 0/+1 grade on Lachman and a mean 2.86-mm KT 1000. The overall results of revision ACL surgery are encouraging in providing symptomatic relief and restoring stability; however, they are significantly lower than primary ACL surgery.
机译:进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定原发性前交叉韧带(ACL)重建失败的病因,并评估修订ACL手术的临床结果。 1989年1月至1996年1月,对90例ACL重建失败的患者进行了ACL翻修手术。 ACL重建失败的病因包括47例手术技术错误,22例外伤性再损伤,7例缺乏移植物结合,3例运动减退,3例与合成移植物有关,以及8例未解决的对准或联合韧带不稳定模式。在52例ACL修订版中,至少随访2年的患者中,有43例接受了问卷调查,并接受了全面的身体检查。特殊外科医院的膝盖韧带评估显示63%的好/好结果。客观松弛测试显示,所有患者中有77%的Lachman评分为0 / + 1,平均KT 1000为2.86-mm。修订ACL手术的总体结果令人鼓舞,可提供症状缓解和恢复稳定性;但是,它们明显低于原发性ACL手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号