首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus.
【24h】

Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus.

机译:评估三种不同的酒精手擦对57种金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株的杀菌效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus. The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising practices in the ITUs. Following AHR exposure, surviving bacteria were enumerated using a standard plate count method plus a Bioscreen C Microbial Growth Analyser. The AHRs demonstrated variable efficacy against the clinical isolates: the mean log(10) reduction after 10 s exposure to Soft Care Med H5, Cutan and Guest Medical AHRs was 2.67, 0.696 and 1.96, respectively, and after 30 s exposure was 4.58, 1.74 and 3.60, respectively. Since the average time taken by healthcare workers (HCWs) to rub AHR onto their hands was 11 s and 15 s at the two hospitals, the efficacy of these AHRs may be significantly limited against the S. aureus isolates under the conditions observed in practice. In addition, differences observed in log(10) reduction in bacterial number post-exposure using the Bioscreen compared to the plate count method provided evidence that S. aureus may be able to recover following Guest Medical AHR treatment within 2 min exposure, whereas after 5 min exposure bacterial damage caused by the AHR was irreversible. Although the introduction of AHRs improved hand hygiene compliance among HCWs, our observations highlighted that contact time is an important factor to ensure the efficacy of these products.
机译:我们测试了在两个当地威尔士强化治疗单位(ITUs)中使用的三种酒精洗手液(AHR)对金黄色葡萄球菌的疗效。该测试协议基于载波测试,并在观察到ITU中的手部消毒习惯后选择了参数(浓度,接触时间)。暴露于AHR后,使用标准平板计数方法加上Bioscreen C微生物生长分析仪对存活的细菌进行计数。 AHRs对临床分离株的疗效表现出不同的效果:Soft Care Med H5,Cutan和Guest Medical AHRs暴露10 s后,平均log(10)减少分别为2.67、0.696和1.96,暴露30 s后分别为4.58、1.74和3.60。由于两家医院的医护人员(HCW)在其手上擦拭AHR的平均时间分别为11 s和15 s,因此在实践中观察到的条件下,这些AHRs对金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的疗效可能会受到很大限制。此外,与平板计数法相比,使用Bioscreen与平板计数法相比,暴露后细菌数log(10)减少的差异提供了证据,表明在接受Guest Medical AHR治疗后2分钟内金黄色葡萄球菌可能能够恢复,而在5分钟后最小暴露由AHR引起的细菌损害是不可逆的。尽管引入AHR可以改善HCW中的手部卫生状况,但我们的观察结果强调,接触时间是确保这些产品功效的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号