首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Uterine incision-to-delivery interval and perinatal outcomes in transverse versus vertical incisions in preterm cesarean deliveries
【24h】

Uterine incision-to-delivery interval and perinatal outcomes in transverse versus vertical incisions in preterm cesarean deliveries

机译:早产剖宫产的横向切口与垂直切口的子宫切口-分娩间隔和围产期结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the uterine incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal and maternal complications in vertical versus transverse uterine incisions in preterm cesarean births. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton cesarean deliveries from 2002 to 2009 between 23 and 34 weeks of gestation. Statistical analysis utilized Wilcoxon rank-sum test and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 773 singleton cesarean deliveries, 586 (75.8%) had a transverse uterine incision and 187 (24.2%) had vertical uterine incision (classical=134 and low vertical incision=53). After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in incision-to-delivery interval between the two types of incisions. The risk for maternal transfusion was higher among those with a vertical incision (odds ratio: 2.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 4.67) than those with a transverse incision. Incision type was not associated with any neonatal outcomes studied, including intraventricular hemorrhage, Apgar scores and neonatal mortality. Conclusion: We observed no difference in Uterine Incision-to-Delivery interval and neonatal complications between vertical and transverse incision. Performance of a vertical uterine incision for the sole reason of facilitating a more rapid delivery is not justified. Development of methods to better determine transverse incision feasibility may facilitate a decrease in vertical uterine incisions.
机译:目的:比较早产剖宫产的垂直和横向子宫切口的子宫切口-分娩间隔以及新生儿和产妇并发症。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2002年至2009年妊娠23至34周的单胎剖宫产。统计分析采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和多变量logistic回归。结果:在773例单胎剖宫产中,有子宫横向切口586例(75.8%),有垂直子宫切口187例(24.2%)(经典= 134,低垂直切口= 53)。调整混杂因素后,两种类型的切口之间的切口到分娩间隔没有显着差异。垂直切口患者的产妇输血风险要高出横向切口患者(几率:2.17; 95%置信区间:1.00、4.67)。切口类型与研究的任何新生儿结局均不相关,包括脑室内出血,Apgar评分和新生儿死亡率。结论:我们观察到垂直切口和横向切口在子宫切开分娩间隔和新生儿并发症方面没有差异。仅出于促进更快速分娩的唯一原因而进行垂直子宫切口是不合理的。更好地确定横向切口可行性的方法的开发可以促进垂直子宫切口的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号