首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >How accurately are we coding readmission diagnoses after total joint arthroplasty?
【24h】

How accurately are we coding readmission diagnoses after total joint arthroplasty?

机译:全关节置换术后我们对再次入院诊断的编码方式有多准确?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Readmission rates have been cited as an important quality measure in the Affordable Care Act. Accordingly, understanding and accurately tracking the causes for readmission will be increasingly important. We queried an electronic database for all patients who underwent primary THA or TKA at our institution from 2006 through 2010. We identified those readmitted within 90 days of surgery and analyzed 87 random de-identified medical records. We then assigned a clinical diagnosis for each readmission, which was then compared with the coder-derived diagnosis by ICD-9 code. The overall 90-day readmission rate was 7.9%. We identified 22 of 87 patients for whom there was disagreement (25.3%, 95% CI = 16.6-35.8%). The most common were procedure-related complications. Coded diagnoses frequently did not correlate with the physician-derived diagnoses. The unverified use of coded readmission diagnoses in calculating quality measures may not be clinically relevant.
机译:再入院率在《平价医疗法案》中被认为是一项重要的质量指标。因此,了解和准确追踪再入院的原因将变得越来越重要。我们查询了从2006年至2010年在我们机构中接受过原发性THA或TKA的所有患者的电子数据库。我们确定了在手术90天之内再次入院的患者,并分析了87份身份不明的随机医疗记录。然后,我们为每次再次入院分配了临床诊断,然后将其与ICD-9代码与编码器得出的诊断进行比较。 90天的总再入院率为7.9%。我们在87例存在分歧的患者中鉴定出22例(25.3%,95%CI = 16.6-35.8%)。最常见的是与手术相关的并发症。编码的诊断经常与医师得出的诊断无关。在计算质量度量时未经验证使用编码再入院诊断可能与临床无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号