首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Cost Analysis and Surgical Site Infection Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Traditional vs. Single-Use Instrumentation
【24h】

Cost Analysis and Surgical Site Infection Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Traditional vs. Single-Use Instrumentation

机译:传统与一次性器械比较全膝关节置换术的成本分析和手术部位感染率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if traditional vs. single-use instrumentation had an effect on SSI's. We compared SSI rates and costs of TKAs performed with single-use (449) and traditional (169) TKA instrumentation trays. Total OR Time was, on average, 30 min less when single-use instrumentation was used. SSIs decreased in the single-use group (n=1) compared to the traditional group (n=5) (P=0.006). Single-use instrumentation added $490 in initial costs; however it saved between $480 and $600. Single-use instrumentation may provide a benefit to the patient by potentially decreasing the risk of infection and reducing the overall hospital costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:手术部位感染(SSI)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的重要并发症。这项研究的目的是评估传统仪器还是一次性仪器对SSI的影响。我们比较了使用一次性(449)和传统(169)TKA仪器托盘执行的TKA的SSI率和成本。使用一次性仪器后,总手术时间平均减少了30分钟。与传统组(n = 5)相比,一次性组(n = 1)的SSI降低(P = 0.006)。一次性使用仪器会增加490美元的初始成本;但是,它节省了480至600美元。一次性仪器可通过潜在地降低感染风险并降低整体医院成本为患者带来好处。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号