首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 2 techniques.
【24h】

Trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 2 techniques.

机译:全髋关节置换术中的转子粗隆截骨术:两种技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study of 100 cemented total hip arthroplasties was performed in 2 different hospitals. Group 1 hips (50 hips in 42 patients; mean follow-up period, 5.4 years) had been operated on with the modified Liverpool technique involving an anterior osteotomy of the greater trochanter. These were compared with group 2 (50 hips in 41 patients; mean follow-up period, 6.2 years), in whom a Charnley transtrochanteric osteotomy approach was used. The 2 groups showed no significant difference with respect to hip abductor muscle power (MRC grading), trochanteric union, Trendelenberg gait, heterotopic ossification (Brooker grading), and patient satisfaction assessed with the help of a questionnaire. Group 2 had a larger number of trochanteric problems, whereas group 1 had a greater increase in mobility scores after surgery.
机译:在2家不同的医院进行了100例骨水泥性全髋关节置换术的研究。第1组髋关节(42例患者中有50髋;平均随访期5.4年)采用改良的Liverpool技术进行手术,其中包括大转子的前截骨术。将这些患者与第2组(41例患者中50髋;平均随访时间6.2年)进行了比较,其中采用了Charnley转子粗隆截骨术。两组在髋外展肌力量(MRC分级),股骨转子联合,Trendelenberg步态,异位骨化(布鲁克分级)和通过问卷调查评估的患者满意度方面无显着差异。第2组有较大的股骨转子问题,而第1组在手术后的活动性评分增加较多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号