...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran sustained release 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg in major depressive disorder: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran sustained release 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg in major depressive disorder: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

机译:左旋米那普仑在重大抑郁症中持续释放40 mg,80 mg或120 mg的功效和安全性:一项3期,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose levomilnacipran sustained release (SR) compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); the study was conducted from September 2009-May 2011. Method: Outpatients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD with an ongoing major depressive episode ≥ 8 weeks' duration. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 179) or levomilnacipran SR 40 mg (n = 181), 80 mg (n = 181), or 120 mg (n = 183) once daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by a 2-week double-blind down-taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline on the clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The prespecified secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I). Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: The least squares mean difference (LSMD) for change from baseline in MADRS total score was significantly superior to placebo for all dose groups: -3.23 (P = .0186), -3.99 (P = .0038), and -4.86 (P = .0005) for levomilnacipran SR 40, 80, and 120 mg, respectively. The LSMD was significantly different for levomilnacipran SR 80 mg and 120 mg versus placebo on the SDS (-2.51 and -2.57, respectively, P .05 for both doses), HDRS17 (-2.09 and -2.34, respectively, P .05 for both doses), CGI-S (-0.43 [P .01] and -0.35 [P .05], respectively), and CGI-I (-0.34 and -0.32, respectively, P .05 for both doses) assessments. The most common treatmentemergent adverse events (≥ 10% of any treatment group) were headache, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and hyperhidrosis. Conclusions: Levomilnacipran SR demonstrated significant improvement in depressive symptoms and functioning relative to placebo. In this study, levomilnacipran SR was generally well tolerated.
机译:目的:这项三期,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究评估了固定剂量左旋米那普仑缓释(SR)与安慰剂相比在重度抑郁症(MDD)中的疗效和耐受性;该研究于2009年9月至2011年5月进行。方法:门诊患者符合DSM-IV-TR的MDD标准,持续严重抑郁发作持续时间≥8周。进行1周安慰剂导入后,患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(n = 179)或左旋米那普仑SR 40 mg(n = 181),80 mg(n = 181)或120 mg(n = 183)一次每天进行8周的双盲治疗,然后进行2周的双盲收缩。主要功效参数是临床医师评定的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分与基线相比的变化。预先指定的次要功效参数是Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)总分与基线相比的变化。其他疗效指标包括17个项目的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS17)和临床总体印象-疾病严重程度(CGI-S)和-改善(CGI-1)。还评估了安全性和耐受性。结果:在所有剂量组中,MADRS总得分与基线相比的最小二乘均方差(LSMD)显着优于安慰剂:-3.23(P = .0186),-3.99(P = .0038)和-4.86(对于左旋米那普林SR 40、80和120 mg,P = 0.0005)。左旋米那普仑SR 80 mg和120 mg的LSMD与SDS上的安慰剂(分别为-2.51和-2.57,两个剂量分别为P <.05),HDRS17(分别为-2.09和-2.34,P <.05两种剂量),CGI-S(分别为-0.43 [P <.01]和-0.35 [P <.05])和CGI-1(两种剂量分别为-0.34和-0.32,P <.05 )评估。最常见的治疗紧急事件(占所有治疗组的10%以上)是头痛,恶心,便秘,口干,心律加快和多汗症。结论:与安慰剂相比,左旋米那普仑SR表现出抑郁症状和功能的显着改善。在这项研究中,左旋milnacipran SR通常被很好地耐受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号