...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN >Levomilnacipran ER 40 mg and 80 mg in patients with major depressive disorder: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study
【24h】

Levomilnacipran ER 40 mg and 80 mg in patients with major depressive disorder: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study

机译:患有严重抑郁症的左旋米那普仑ER 40 mg和80 mg:III期,随机,双盲,固定剂量,安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a global health concern. This study examined the efficacy, safety and tolerability of an extended-release (ER) formulation of levomilnacipran, an antidepressant approved for the treatment of MDD in adults. Methods: This 10- week (1-week placebo run-in period, 8-week double-blind treatment, 1-week down-taper), multicentre, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted between June 2011 and March 2012. Adult outpatients (age 18-75 yr) with MDD were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to placebo or to levomilnacipran ER 40 mg/day or 80 mg/day. For primary efficacy, we analyzed the Montgomery-?sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from baseline to week 8 using a mixed-effects model for repeatedmeasures approach on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. For secondary efficacy, we used the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and for safety, we examined adverse events and laboratory, vital sign/physical and electrocardiography findings. Results: The ITT population consisted of 185 patients in the placebo group, 185 in the levomilnacipran ER 40 mg/day group and 187 in the levomilnacipran ER 80 mg/ day group. Study completion rates were similar among the groups (76%-83%). On MADRS change from baseline the least squares mean difference (LSMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) versus placebo was significant for levomilnacipran ER 40 mg/day (-3.3 [-5.5 to -1.1], p = 0.003) and 80 mg/day (-3.1, [-5.3 to -1.0], p = 0.004). On SDS change from baseline the LSMD (and 95% CI) versus placebo was also significant for levomilnacipran ER 40 mg/day (-1.8, 95% [-3.6 to 0], p = 0.046) and 80 mg/day (-2.7 [-4.5 to -0.9], p = 0.003). More patients in the levomilnacipran ER than the placebo group prematurely exited the study owing to adverse events; common adverse events (≥ 5% and ≥ double the rate of placebo) were nausea, dry mouth, increased heart rate, constipation, dizziness, hyperhidrosis, urinary hesitation and erectile dysfunction. Limitations: Limitations to our study included short treatment duration and lack of an active control arm. Conclusion: Levomilnacipran ER at doses of 40 mg/day and 80 mg/day demonstrated efficacy on symptomatic and functional measures of MDD and was generally well tolerated in this patient population. Clinical trial registration: NCT01377194.
机译:背景:严重抑郁症(MDD)是全球性的健康问题。这项研究检查了左旋米那普仑的缓释(ER)制剂的功效,安全性和耐受性,左旋米那普仑是一种批准用于成人MDD治疗的抗抑郁药。方法:本研究为期10周(安慰剂磨合期为1周,双盲治疗为8周,锥度为1周),多中心,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组,固定剂量研究这项研究于2011年6月至2012年3月进行。成年门诊患者(年龄在18-75岁之间)患有MDD,被随机分配(1:1:1)安慰剂或左旋米普仑ER 40 mg /天或80 mg /天。对于主要功效,我们使用混合效应模型对意向性治疗(ITT)人群进行重复测量,分析了从基线到第8周的蒙哥马利抑郁量表(MADRS)的变化。对于次要疗效,我们使用了Sheehan残疾量表(SDS),为了安全起见,我们检查了不良事件以及实验室,生命体征/身体和心电图检查结果。结果:ITT人群包括安慰剂组185名患者,左旋米那普仑ER 40 mg /天组185例和左旋米那普仑ER 80 mg /天组187例。各组的研究完成率相似(76%-83%)。关于MADRS从基线的变化,左旋米那普仑ER 40 mg /天(-3.3 [-5.5至-1.1],p = 0.003)和80 mg与安慰剂相比,最小二乘均方差(LSMD)和95%置信区间(CI)与安慰剂有显着差异/天(-3.1,[-5.3至-1.0],p = 0.004)。在从基线开始的SDS变化中,左旋米那普仑ER 40 mg /天(-1.8,95%[-3.6至0],p = 0.046)和80 mg /天(-2.7)与安慰剂相比LSMD(和95%CI)与安慰剂也显着[-4.5至-0.9],p = 0.003)。左旋米那普仑ER中由于不良事件而退出研究的人数要多于安慰剂组。常见的不良事件(≥5%,且安慰剂发生率≥两倍)为恶心,口干,心律加快,便秘,头晕,多汗症,尿he和勃起功能障碍。局限性:我们研究的局限性包括治疗时间短和缺乏主动控制臂。结论:左旋米那普仑ER分别以40 mg /天和80 mg /天的剂量表现出对MDD的症状和功能指标有效,并且在该患者人群中通常耐受良好。临床试验注册:NCT01377194。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号