...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >A randomized controlled trial of long-acting injectable risperidone vs continuation on oral atypical antipsychotics for first-episode schizophrenia patients: initial adherence outcome.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of long-acting injectable risperidone vs continuation on oral atypical antipsychotics for first-episode schizophrenia patients: initial adherence outcome.

机译:长效可注射利培酮与继续口服非典型抗精神病药对首发精神分裂症患者的随机对照试验:初始依从性结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Nonadherence for first-episode schizophrenia is a major unsolved challenge. The long-acting injectable route is an appealing strategy, but there are concerns about acceptability. We report on acceptance and initial adherence outcomes with risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) in first-episode schizophrenia patients. METHOD: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial in which we enrolled patients defined by appropriate Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis and < or = 16 weeks of lifetime antipsychotic exposure. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to a recommendation of changing to RLAI versus continuing on oral therapy (ORAL). Nonadherence behavior was defined as a medication gap > or = 14 days. Adherence attitudes were determined by the Rating of Medication Influences (ROMI) scale. A priori analysis defined treatment groups as intent-to-treat (ITT) and as-actually-treated (AAT) for the first 12 weeks after initial randomization. Participants were enrolled from December 2004 to March 2007. RESULTS: Of 46 eligible patients, 37 were randomly assigned, 11 to ORAL and 26 to RLAI. Nineteen of 26 patients (73%) accepted the RLAI recommendation. There were no differences in adherence behavior at 12 weeks based on initial randomization (Kaplan-Meier survival for ITT: 76% [95% CI, 35%-90%] adherent for RLAI vs 72% [95% CI, 55%-89%] for ORAL; log-rank P = .78), but patients accepting RLAI were significantly more likely to be adherent than patients staying on ORAL (AAT: 89% [95% CI, 64%-97%] adherent for RLAI vs 59% [95% CI, 32%-78%] for ORAL; log-rank P = .035). There were no ROMI attitude differences between either treatment group comparison at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Most first-episode patients taking oral antipsychotics will accept a recommendation of RLAI therapy. On the basis of initial randomization status, an RLAI recommendation did not affect adherence behavior at 12 weeks. However, acceptance of RLAI was associated with significantly better adherence. Regardless of whether RLAI is recommended or accepted, there is no adverse impact on subsequent medication attitudes at 12 weeks. These results support the feasibility and acceptability of introducing RLAI as a treatment option for first-episode schizophrenia patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00220714.
机译:目的:不坚持治疗首发精神分裂症是一项主要的未解决挑战。长效注射途径是一种吸引人的策略,但是人们对可接受性存在担忧。我们报告了利培酮长效注射液(RLAI)在首发精神分裂症患者中的接受程度和初始依从性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,在该研究中,我们纳入了通过适当的结构化临床访谈定义的患者,以进行DSM-IV诊断和<或= 16周终生抗精神病药物暴露。参与者被随机分配(比例为2:1)以建议改用RLAI而不是继续口服治疗(ORAL)。不依从行为定义为用药间隔>或= 14天。坚持态度由药物影响评估(ROMI)量表确定。先验分析将治疗组定义为初始随机分组后的前12周的意图治疗(ITT)和实际治疗(AAT)。结果从2004年12月至2007年3月参加了研究。结果:在46例合格患者中,随机分配了37名患者,其中11名为ORAL,26名为RLAI。 26名患者中有19名(73%)接受了RLAI建议。根据最初的随机化,第12周的依从行为没有差异(ITT的Kaplan-Meier生存率:RLAI依从性为76%[95%CI,35%-90%],而72%[95%CI,55%-89] ORAL;%log log P = .78),但接受RLAI的患者比坚持口服的患者更有可能依从(AAT:RLAI的依从性为89%[95%CI,64%-97%] ORAL为59%[95%CI,32%-78%];对数排名P = .035)。 12周时,两个治疗组之间的ROMI态度均无差异。结论:大多数口服抗精神病药的首发患者将接受RLAI治疗的建议。根据初始随机状态,RLAI建议在12周时不影响依从行为。但是,接受RLAI可以显着改善依从性。不管是推荐还是接受RLAI,在第12周时都不会对后续用药态度产生不利影响。这些结果支持引入RLAI作为首发精神分裂症患者的治疗选择的可行性和可接受性。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00220714。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号