首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prophylaxis study of adjunctive gabapentin for bipolar disorder.
【24h】

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prophylaxis study of adjunctive gabapentin for bipolar disorder.

机译:加巴喷丁辅助治疗双相情感障碍的双盲,随机,安慰剂对照预防研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first randomized, controlled trial assessing the prophylactic efficacy of gabapentin in bipolar disorder. METHOD: We conducted a 1-year, double-blind, randomized, comparative, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. As this was a pure prophylactic trial, only euthymic bipolar I and II patients (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to gabapentin (N = 13) or placebo (N = 12) added to the current treatment (lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, or any combination but not antipsychotics or antidepressants). Subjects participated in the study for 12 months. The primary efficacy parameter was the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Bipolar Illness, Modified (CGI-BP-M), which was assessed at all visits. Other assessments were the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the systematic collection of reported adverse events. Data were collected from May 1999 to February 2004. RESULTS: The change from baseline to month 12 in mean CGI-BP-M scores between groups was statistically significant (p = .0046). Mean score change from baseline to endpoint in the gabapentin group was -2.1, and the mean score change in the placebo group was -0.6. No emerging manic or depressive symptoms were seen in either group as measured with the YMRS, HAM-D, HAM-A, and PSQI. In the PSQI-6 subscale (use of sleeping medication), the mean score change at month 12 in the gabapentin group was 0.9, and the mean score change in the placebo group was 0.05 (p = .0267). Overall, gabapentin was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This small, randomized clinical trial comparing the prophylactic efficacy of adjunctive gabapentin to placebo suggests that, despite lack of acute efficacy, treatment with gabapentin might provide some benefit on the long-term outcome of bipolar disorder.
机译:目的:进行第一个随机对照试验,评估加巴喷丁在双相情感障碍中的预防作用。方法:我们进行了为期1年的双盲,随机,比较,安慰剂对照,平行组,多中心研究。由于这是一项纯粹的预防性试验,因此仅以1:1的比例将加法比丁(N = 13)或安慰剂(N = 12)按比例分配给当前治疗中的正常乙型双极I和II患者(DSM-IV)(锂,丙戊酸盐,卡马西平或其任何组合,但不包括抗精神病药或抗抑郁药)。受试者参加了12个月的研究。主要疗效参数是改良的双相情感障碍临床总体印象量表(CGI-BP-M),在所有就诊时均进行了评估。其他评估包括年轻躁狂症评分量表(YMRS),汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D),汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A),匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI),以及系统报告的不良事件的收集。收集了从1999年5月到2004年2月的数据。结果:从基线到第12个月,各组之间的CGI-BP-M平均得分的变化具有统计学意义(p = .0046)。加巴喷丁组从基线到终点的平均得分变化为-2.1,而安慰剂组的平均得分变化为-0.6。用YMRS,HAM-D,HAM-A和PSQI测量,两组均未出现躁狂或抑郁症状。在PSQI-6分量表(使用睡眠药物)中,加巴喷丁组第12个月的平均得分变化为0.9,而安慰剂组的平均得分变化为0.05(p = .0267)。总体而言,加巴喷丁耐受性良好。结论:该小型随机临床试验比较了加巴喷丁与安慰剂的预防性疗效,表明尽管缺乏急性疗效,加巴喷丁治疗仍可为双相情感障碍的长期疗效提供一定的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号