...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of dermatological treatment >Ablative fractional laser treatment for hypertrophic scars: Comparison between Er:YAG and CO2 fractional lasers
【24h】

Ablative fractional laser treatment for hypertrophic scars: Comparison between Er:YAG and CO2 fractional lasers

机译:烧蚀性分级激光治疗肥厚性瘢痕:Er:YAG和CO2分级激光的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Nonablative fractional photothermolysis has been reported to show early promise in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, but there are few reports on ablative fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Er:YAG fractional laser (EYFL) and CO2 fractional laser (CO2FL) for treatment of hypertrophic scars. Methods: Thirteen patients with hypertrophic scars were treated with 2,940 nm EYFL, and ten were treated with 10,600 nm CO2FL. An independent physician evaluator assessed the treatment outcomes using Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and 5-point grading scale (grade 0, no improvement; grade 1, 1-25%; grade 2, 26-50%; grade 3, 51-75%; grade 4, 76-100% improvement). Patients are queried about their subjective satisfaction with the treatment outcomes. Results: After the final treatment, average percentage changes of VSS were 28.2% for EYFL and 49.8% for CO2FL. Improvement was evident in terms of pliability, while insignificant in terms of vascularity and pigmentation. Based on physician's global assessment, mean grade of 1.8 for EYFL and 2.7 for CO2FL was achieved. Patient's subjective satisfaction scores paralleled the physician's objective evaluation.Conclusion: CO2FL is a potentially effective and safe modality for the treatment of hypertrophic scars, particularly in terms of pliability.
机译:背景:据报道,非烧蚀性分级光热解法在肥厚性瘢痕的治疗中显示出早期前景,但很少有报道报道烧蚀性分级光热解法用于肥厚性瘢痕的治疗。目的:评估和比较Er:YAG分数激光(EYFL)和CO2分数激光(CO2FL)治疗肥厚性瘢痕的疗效和安全性。方法:13例肥厚性瘢痕患者接受2940 nm EYFL治疗,十例接受10600 nm CO2FL治疗。独立的医师评估师使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和5分等级量表(0级,无改善; 1级,1-25%; 2级,26-50%; 3级,51-75)评估治疗结果%; 4级,改善76-100%)。向患者询问其对治疗结果的主观满意度。结果:最终治疗后,EYFL的VSS平均变化率为28.2%,CO2FL的平均变化为49.8%。就柔韧性而言,改善是明显的,而在血管和色素沉着方面却是微不足道的。根据医师的整体评估,EYFL的平均等级为1.8,CO2FL的平均等级为2.7。患者的主观满意度得分与医师的客观评价相符。结论:CO2FL是一种治疗肥厚性瘢痕的潜在有效且安全的方法,尤其是在柔韧性方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号