首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery: Official Journal of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery >The acute effect of IABP-induced pulsatility on coronary vascular resistance and graft flow in critical ill patients during ECMO.
【24h】

The acute effect of IABP-induced pulsatility on coronary vascular resistance and graft flow in critical ill patients during ECMO.

机译:IABP引起的搏动对ECMO危重患者冠状动脉血管阻力和移植物流量的急性影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: The combination of the two cardiac support mechanisms of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and non-pulsatile circulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been confirmed to improve efficacy of the cardiac support as a whole. However, reports on benefits of diastolic augmentation on coronary vascular bed and graft flowmetry during concomitant use of IABP and ECMO are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute impact of IABP support on coronary vascular resistance (CVR) and coronary bypass flows (CBF) in high-risk patients with peripheral ECMO following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: In eight emergency CABG patients (mean age=67.8+/-1.9 years; gender: six male and two female; EF=25.5+/-2.4%) requiring mechanical circulatory support with ECMO hemodynamic parameters, CVR, CBF, diastolic filling index (DFI), graft flow reserve (GFR), and pulsatility index (PI) were analyzed with and without diastolic augmentation using a transit time flowmeter. RESULTS: The addition of IABP to ECMO decreased CVR significantly by 6.5%+/-1.9% compared to baseline with ECMO alone (1.62+/-0.2 versus 1.78+/-0.2; P<0.0045). Accordingly, significant higher mean CBF were found during IABP assist, resulting in a 21.6%+/-2.6% increase (60.7+/-8.7 mL/min with versus 51.3+/-7.4 mL/min without IABP; P<0.0001). IABP also significantly increased DFI by 9.8+/-0.9% (73.2%+/-1.4% with versus 66.7%+/-1.3% without IABP; P<0.0001). GFR was recruited during IABP in all grafts (GFR>1). There were no statistically significant differences in PI with and without IABP assistance (2.6+/-0.1 versus 2.5+/-0.2). CONCLUSION: IABP-induced pulsatility significantly improves diastolic filling index and mean coronary bypass graft flows by lowering coronary vascular resistance during non-pulsatile peripheral ECMO. The combination of ECMO with IABP may provide more optimal myocardial oxygen conditions resulting in an improved efficacy of the cardiac support as a whole in critical ill patients with postcardiotomy myocardial dysfunction following CABG.
机译:目的:主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)和非搏动性循环体外膜氧合(ECMO)两种心脏支持机制的组合已被证实可提高整体心脏支持的功效。但是,尚无关于在同时使用IABP和ECMO时舒张压增大对冠状动脉血管床和移植物流量的好处的报道。这项研究的目的是评估IABP支持对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)后高危患者周围ECMO患者的冠状血管阻力(CVR)和冠状动脉旁路血流(CBF)的急性影响。方法:在八名急诊CABG患者中(平均年龄= 67.8 +/- 1.9岁;性别:六名男性和两名女性; EF = 25.5 +/- 2.4%),他们需要机械循环支持并具有ECMO血液动力学参数,CVR,CBF,舒张期充盈指数(DFI),移植物血流储备(GFR)和搏动指数(PI)使用或不使用舒张期时长流量计进行分析。结果:与单独ECMO的基线相比,向ECMO中添加IABP可使CVR显着降低6.5%+ /-1.9%(1.62 +/- 0.2对1.78 +/- 0.2; P <0.0045)。因此,在IABP辅助期间发现了较高的平均CBF,导致21.6%+ /-2.6%的增加(有IABP时为60.7 +/- 8.7 mL / min,无IABP时为51.3 +/- 7.4 mL / min; P <0.0001)。 IABP还使DFI显着提高了9.8 +/- 0.9%(有IABP时为73.2%+ /-1.4%,而没有IABP时为66.7%+ /-1.3%; P <0.0001)。 IABP期间所有移植物中均募集了GFR(GFR> 1)。有和没有IABP辅助时,PI的统计学差异均无统计学意义(2.6 +/- 0.1对2.5 +/- 0.2)。结论:IABP引起的搏动性通过降低非搏动性周围ECMO期间的冠状动脉血管阻力而显着改善了舒张期充盈指数和平均冠状动脉搭桥术的流量。 ECMO与IABP的组合可提供更理想的心肌氧状况,从而改善CABG后发生明信片切开型心肌功能障碍的重症患者整体心脏支持的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号