首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy >Intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of 400 mg of etravirine once daily versus 200 mg of etravirine twice daily in HIV-infected patients
【24h】

Intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of 400 mg of etravirine once daily versus 200 mg of etravirine twice daily in HIV-infected patients

机译:在HIV感染的患者中,每天一次400 mg依曲韦林与每天两次200 mg依曲韦林的细胞内和血浆药代动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To compare intracellular and plasma etravirine concentrations when etravirine was given at 200 mg/12 h versus 400 mg/24 h and to evaluate whether the results would support once-daily dosing. Methods: This was an open-label sequential study in which eight patients on protease inhibitor (PI)-sparing regimens containing etravirine were included. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were performed while on 200 mg of etravirine/12 h and after switching to 400 mg of etravirine/24 h. Intracellular and plasma levels were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis and compared by geometric mean ratios (GMRs) using 200 mg of etravirine/12 h as the reference group. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01121809. Results: The geometric mean (GM) for etravirine AUC_(0-iota) (5602 versus 5076 ng centre dot h/mL, GMR 0.91), C_(max) (403 versus 495 ng/mL, GMR 1.23) and C_(min) (139 versus 102 ng/mL, GMR 0.74) were similar with both dosing schedules at the intracellular level. In plasma, the GMRs for AUC_(0-iota), C_(max) and C_(min) were 1.31,1.76 and 0.99, respectively. The mean intracellular penetration, evaluated as intracellular and plasma AUC_(0-iota) ratios, was 81% when etravirine was dosed twice daily and 56% with once-daily dosing. Conclusions: Our results show that intracellular etravirine levels were similar with both dosing regimens in patients with PI-sparing regimens, while etravirine plasma AUC_(0-iota) and C_(max) were 30% and 76% higher with the once-daily regimen, respectively. Thus, a once-daily dosing regimen is supported not only by plasma etravirine pharmacokinetic profiles but also by intracellular levels.
机译:目的:比较以200 mg / 12 h和400 mg / 24 h给予依曲韦林时细胞内和血浆中依曲韦林的浓度,并评估结果是否支持每天一次给药。方法:这是一项开放标签的顺序研究,其中包括八名采用依曲韦林的蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)保留方案的患者。在200 mg依曲韦林/ 12 h时和切换至400 mg依曲韦林/ 24 h时进行完整的药代动力学分析。通过液相色谱结合质谱法测定细胞内和血浆水平。通过非房室分析计算药代动力学参数,并以200 mg依曲韦林/ 12 h为参考组,通过几何平均比(GMR)进行比较。试用注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01121809。结果:依特韦林AUC_(0-iota)的几何平均值(GM)(5602对5076 ng中心点h / mL,GMR 0.91),C_(max)(403对495 ng / mL,GMR 1.23)和C_(最小)(139 vs 102 ng / mL,GMR 0.74)在细胞内水平上的两种给药方案均相似。在血浆中,AUC_(0-iota),C_(max)和C_(min)的GMR分别为1.31、1.76和0.99。依曲韦林每天两次给药时,平均细胞内渗透率以细胞内和血浆AUC_(0-iota)比率评估,为81%,每天给药为56%。结论:我们的结果表明,PI保留方案患者的两种给药方案中的细胞内依曲韦林水平均相似,而每日一次方案的依曲韦林血浆AUC_(0-iota)和C_(max)分别升高30%和76% , 分别。因此,每天一次的给药方案不仅受到血浆依曲韦林药代动力学的支持,还受到细胞内水平的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号